Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 2001 41(4):758-769; doi:10.1093/icb/41.4.758
© 2001 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cushman, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Osmoregulation in Plants: Implications for Agriculture1

John C. Cushman2,1
1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0014


    SYNOPSIS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Drought and salinity stress are the major causes of historic and modern agricultural productivity losses throughout the world. Both drought and salinity result in osmotic stress that may lead to inhibition of growth. Salinity causes additional ion toxicity effects mainly through perturbations in protein and membrane structure. In contrast to animals, which rely on Na+/K+-ATPases for the expulsion of osmotica, plants rely on plasma membrane and endosomal ATPase activities to generate proton gradients to drive ion extrusion and intracellular sequestration. Consequently, most angiosperms, including all major crop species, have a diminished capacity for Na+ transport and tolerance to high salinity. New insights into the molecular mechanisms of Na+/K+ discrimination, Na+ extrusion and compartmentation, water transport, and osmolyte biosynthesis and function have led to genetically engineered plants with improved salt, drought, and cold tolerance. A deeper understanding of the complex signal transduction and regulatory responses to osmotic stress promises novel strategies for improving salinity and drought tolerance that will be of practical benefit to agriculture.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Drought and soil salinization in both dry land and irrigated agricultural settings are major factors in limiting agricultural productivity worldwide. More than 20% of all cultivated lands are estimated to be salt-stressed with up to one-third of agricultural lands being salt-affected in certain countries (Flowers and Yeo, 1995Go). Irrigation water typically contains some salts, which eventually build up, leading to salinization related losses in productivity for up to half of the areas under irrigation (Seckler et al., 1998Go; Flowers and Yeo, 1995Go). Attempts to generate plant varieties with improved salinity or drought tolerance using selection-based breeding strategies have proved largely unsuccessful (Flowers and Yeo, 1995Go; Flowers et al., 2000Go). This failure can be explained by the well-recognized complexity or multigenic nature of salinity and drought tolerance traits (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000Go; Flowers et al., 2000Go). Although it may be feasible to improve abiotic stress tolerance using whole plant phenotypic or physiological selection strategies and pyramiding breeding schemes, such approaches, even those that employ marker-assisted selection, are slow and require massive screening efforts to identify specific quantitative trait loci. Attempts to engineer improved tolerance using single or multi-gene transfer of "candidate" genes offer far more rapid and promising improvements in stress tolerance. Such genetic engineering strategies, however, are limited by an incomplete understanding of stress tolerance mechanisms. Here, I highlight some of the unique characteristics of plant osmoregulation and discuss how advances in our understanding of these processes will lead to the development of crop plants with improved drought and salinity tolerance.


    OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN PLANTS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
The chemiosmotic regulatory systems of plant and fungal cells differ fundamentally from those found in animal cells. Animal cells rely on a primordial Na+ chemiosmotic circuit consisting of Na+/K+-ATPase "pumps" to drive the efflux of 3Na+ and influx of 2K+ coupled to ATP hydrolysis. This active Na+ extrusion creates an electrochemical Na+ gradient across the plasma membrane to drive secondary symport and antiport carriers that, in turn, regulate nutrient uptake and pH. In contrast, plants appear to lack plasma membrane Na+/K+-ATPases. Thus, plants utilize H+-ATPases for primary extrusion or sequestration of protons to generate H+ electrochemical gradients, which drive secondary ion and nutrient transport processes via H+-symport/antiport systems. These H+-ATPase pumps also modulate both intracellular and extracellular pH.

Except in the case of extreme halophytic archaebacteria, viable cellular processes in animals, fungi, and plants depend upon the maintenance of low cytoplasmic Na+ and Cl concentrations and a high K+/Na+ ratio, because K+ counteracts the inhibitory effects of Na+ (and Li+). Like animal cells, most plant cells maintain cytosolic K+ concentrations in the range of 100–200 mM and Na+ values in the low mM range (1–10 mM) up to a maximum of 100 mM (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999Go). In contrast to K+, an essential cation for maintaining biochemical interactions of the cytoplasm, Na+ is not essential for, but does facilitate, volume regulation and growth in most plants. However, at high concentrations Na+ limits growth (Blumwald, 2000Go). Ironically, the productivity of irrigated agricultural regions is generally many times greater than non-irrigated areas, yet irrigated crops are most susceptible to detrimental salinity effects. Therefore, genetic engineering of crop plants to improve their capacity for Na+ transport and sequestration is an important goal for meeting the future food and fiber demands of a rapidly growing human population.

Many plants, such as extreme halophytes, display Na+ dependence for optimal growth and development and have developed specialized structures such as salt glands and bladders to accommodate high salt concentrations in tissues (Glenn et al., 1999Go). Others have developed whole plant strategies for avoiding stress such as accelerated completion of ontogeny. However, these specialized adaptations are lacking in most major crop species. Furthermore, the precise impact of osmotic and ionic effects on cell growth, division, phytohormone balance, and death in the context of the whole plant are complex and require further investigation (Munns, 2001Go). Therefore, emphasis is placed on the molecular genetic mechanisms controlling osmotic regulation at the cellular level, mainly because the action and regulation of most osmoregulatory components has not been fully explored in the context of the whole plant. The challenge for the coming decade will be to integrate information gathered at the molecular genetic and cellular levels with the complexity of whole plant physiology.


    HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+ AND NA+ CARRIERS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Exposure of plants to high extracellular NaCl concentrations favors Na+ uptake through a system of K+-selective, Na+-selective and non-selective pathways located at both the plasma and vacuolar membranes (Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go; Czempinski et al., 1999Go; Schachtman and Liu, 1999Go; Tyerman and Skerrett, 1999Go; White, 1999Go; Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999Go; Hasegawa et al., 2000Go; Blumwald, 2000Go). Multiple transport mechanisms govern K+:Na+ selectivity and contribute to K+ and Na+ uptake in higher plants (Schachtman, 2000Go). These systems rely upon carriers or high-affinity transporters that undergo a specific conformational change during ion transport and generally operate against a concentration gradient. Such "up hill" carriers are energized by coupling to an electrochemical gradient (e.g., K+-H+ symport, K+-Na+ symport). The first such K+ carrier described in higher plants, HKT1, encodes a high affinity K+ transporter that functions as a Na+-coupled K+ transporter and is thought to contribute to sodium uptake in saline soil (Rubio et al., 1996Go). Under high Na+ concentrations, HKT1 may have more physiological relevance for Na+ uptake than K+ uptake (Diatloff et al., 1998Go; Rubio et al., 1999Go). However, its overall role in the uptake of both ions is probably minor compared with other high-affinity K+ systems (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999Go).

An HKT1 homologue recently isolated from Arabidopsis (AtHKT1) functions primarily as a selective Na+ uptake transporter with very limited K+ uptake activity (Uozumi et al., 2000Go). Since AtHKT1 does not appear to couple Na+ and K+ or Na+ and H+ uptake, it represents a likely candidate for constitutive low-affinity Na+ uptake, a process resulting in the Na+ toxicity following exposure to high salinity. In contrast to HKT1, a low-affinity cation carrier, LCT1, shows no homology to high-affinity carriers and exhibits non-selective, low-affinity uptake of monovalent cations (e.g., K+, Na+, Rb+) as well as calcium and cadmium (Schachtman et al., 1997Go; Clemens et al., 1998Go). Like AtHKT1, this carrier may play a significant role in Na+ uptake under high-salinity conditions, however, details of its transport mechanism have not yet been established.

A second family of high-affinity K+ transporters has been described in Arabidopsis (AtKUP1) (Quintero and Blatt, 1997Go; Kim et al., 1998Go; Fu and Luan, 1998Go) and barley (HAK1) (Santa-María et al., 1997Go). KUP/HAK transporters are extremely selective for K+ and are blocked by mM concentrations of Na+ (Kim et al., 1998Go; Fu and Luan, 1998Go). K+-limiting conditions induce their mRNA levels suggesting they play a primary role in high-affinity K+ uptake. In contrast to HKT transporters, KUP/HAK transporters are thought to move K+ by coupling to the H+ gradient (Santa-María et al., 1997Go). The KUP/HAK gene family consists of multiple members in plants and related transporters have been found in bacteria and fungi (Schachtman and Liu, 1999Go).


    CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE CHANNELS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Plant genomes encode multiple classes of ion channels that mediate K+ and Na+ transport (see Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go; Schachtman and Liu, 1999Go; Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999Go; Zimmermann and Sentenac, 1999Go; Czempinski et al., 1999Go; Blumwald, 2000Go; Schachtman, 2000Go; Blumwald et al., 2000Go; Krol and Trebacz, 2000Go). Ion channels transport ions from the soil solution, secrete ions into xylem sap, and participate in signaling (Zimmermann and Sentenac, 1999Go; Zimmermann et al., 1999Go). In contrast to carriers, ion channels conduct rapid, "downhill" dissipation of transmembrane electrochemical gradients, often under the control of membrane potentials that dictate the gating properties of the channel. Monovalent cation-selective plasma membrane channels are divided into three classes depending on their electrophysiological behavior and ion selectivity.

Inward rectifying channels
K+ inward rectifying channels (KIRCs) conduct current in the direction of the cytoplasm and are highly selective for K+ uptake over Na+ under physiological (micromolar) extracellular K+ and Na+ concentrations. In general, most KIRCs are a major pathway for low-affinity K+ uptake, but appear not to play a significant role in Na+ flux into plant cells (Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go). This class is exemplified by AKT1, which plays a principle role in K+ uptake by plant roots, but is unlikely to play a major role in inadvertent sodium uptake (Hirsch et al., 1998Go; Spalding et al., 1999Go). AKT1 and related channels are members of the Shaker-like K+ channel multi-gene family and function as homotetramers (Daram et al., 1997Go; Czempinski et al., 1999Go; Urbach et al., 2000Go). Additional members of this Shaker-like family, AKT2/AKT3, are weakly inward rectifying and are expressed in both source and sink phloem tissues. Abscisic acid (ABA) up-regulates AKT2 expression, suggesting AKT2 participates in ion equilibrium during drought stress (Lacombe et al., 2000bGo). Novel gene families encoding putative cyclic-nucleotide-gated and calmodulin-regulated K+-uptake channels have also been described in barley (Schuurink et al., 1998Go) and Arabidopsis (Köhler et al., 1999Go).

Outward rectifying channels
A second class of ion channels present in many different plant species and tissues are K+ outward rectifying channels (KORCs) (Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go). The gating characteristics of KORCs are highly selective for K+ efflux and function mainly in K+ release. A KORC expressed in the root pericycle and xylem parenchyma of Arabidopsis, SKOR, plays a major role in the release of K+ into xylem sap for transport to shoots (Gaymard et al., 1998Go; Lacombe et al., 2000aGo). ABA application down-regulates SKOR mRNA accumulation suggesting that this channel controls K+ accumulation in shoots as part of the adaptive response to drought stress (Gaymard et al., 1998Go). Database searching or "in silico" cloning identified a new, so-called KCO (K+ channel family related to the Ca2+ activated, outwardly rectifying) category of K+ channels. Exemplified by KCO1 from Arabidopsis, this family member is an outwardly rectifying K+ channel that resembles the ‘two pore’ K+ channels from animals and contains four predicted transmembrane domains (Czempinski et al., 1997Go). Additional members of this family have been cloned from potato (StKCO1, 2) and Arabidopsis (AtKCO1, 2) with a third Arabidopsis member of this family, AtKCO3, representing a novel type of plant K+ related to animal Kir-type channels (Czempinski et al., 1999Go). AtKCO1 and AtKCO2 differ from related "two-pore" K+ channels in mammals, insects, and fungi by containing two C-terminal Ca+-binding EF-hand domains, which impart calcium-dependent activation of the AtKCO1 channel in the physiological range of cytosolic calcium (150–500 nM) (Czempinski et al., 1997Go).

Voltage-independent or non-selective cation channels
A third class of plasma membrane cation channels, voltage-independent monovalent cation channels (VICs) or non-selective cation (NSC) channels, has gating properties that are not significantly voltage-dependent and possess lower Na+/K+ selectivity compared with KIRCs or even KORCs. NSC channels have been characterized in plant roots, leaf epidermal, and guard cells (Tyerman and Skerrett, 1999Go; Davenport and Tester, 2000Go). Modeling studies and recent single NSC channel measurements demonstrate that Na+ influx through VIC channels is much higher than other channel types under saline conditions (Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go; White, 1999Go). These properties suggest that VIC channels may function as a major pathway for Na+ entry into plant cells exposed to high external salinity (Amtmann and Sanders, 1999Go; White, 1999Go; Davenport and Tester, 2000Go). Due to their dominant role in Na+ entry, VIC channels represent a prime target for genetic manipulation of salt tolerance either by improving their selectivity against Na+ influx or by altering their expression or reducing their activity (White, 1999Go).

Anion channels
Like animal cells, plant cells contain anion channels that regulate anion efflux from the external environment, as well as participate in turgor- and osmoregulation, stomatal movements, nutrient transport, metal tolerance, and signal transduction (Schroeder, 1995Go; Barbier-Brygoo et al., 2000Go). Anion channels are grouped according to whether they are activated by membrane depolarization, hyperpolarization, and stretching, or by second messenger molecules such as Ca2+, nucleotides, or phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events. Anion channels play important roles in the perception and transduction of plant responses to light, phytohormones, pH, malate, CO2, and elicitor molecules (Zimmermann et al., 1999Go). They also participate in the regulation of intracellular ion gradients and have been described in the plasma membrane as well as in vacuolar, thylakoid, and inner mitochondrial membranes (Barbier-Brygoo et al., 2000Go). Under saline conditions, membrane depolarization and extracellular Cl activated anion channels have been described in root cortical cells that regulate membrane potential and Cl uptake (Skerett and Tyerman, 1994Go; Tyerman et al., 1997Go). Root xylem parenchyma cells contain anion efflux channels thought to function during initial phases of xylem loading which requires membrane depolarization to activate outward-rectifying channels and drive anion efflux (Wegner and Raschke, 1994Go). Molecular cloning studies have confirmed that plant genomes encode voltage-dependent chloride ion channels (CLC) related to the animal CLC-protein family (Maduke et al., 2000Go). Details about the specific physiological roles of these anion channels are lacking due to difficulties encountered in obtaining functional channels in heterologous expression systems. However, ongoing efforts promise to provide this information (Barbier-Brygoo et al., 2000Go).


    SODIUM EXTRUSION AND COMPARTMENTATION
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Aside from the K+/Na+ discriminating capacity of transport systems, a plant's ability to tightly control cytoplasmic Na+ concentrations by extrusion and/or compartmentation is critical to avoid Na+ toxicity, control ion fluxes, and regulate pH. The negative electrical membrane potential of the plasma membrane under high extracellular Na+ concentrations forms a large Na+ electrochemical potential gradient that favors the passive transport of Na+ into the cell mediated by various KIRCs, KORCs, and NSCs. In higher plants, H+-translocating plasma membrane ATPases (P-ATPase) and vacuolar H+-ATPases (V-ATPase) participate in salinity stress tolerance by energizing active Na+ extrusion from the cytosol and compartmentation within various endomembrane bound compartments (e.g., endoplasmic reticulum, golgi, and vacuole), respectively (Sze et al., 1999Go; Morsomme and Boutry, 2000Go; Ratajczak, 2000Go). A second electrogenic proton pump, the H+-translocating pyrophosphatase (PPiase), coexists with the V-ATPase in the vacuolar membrane and contributes to maintenance of vacuolar acidity under stress conditions (Maeshima, 2000Go). H+ extrusion from the cell by P-ATPase or into the vacuolar lumen by H+-ATPase or H+-PPiase creates an electrochemical gradient. This proton motive force is used by secondary transporters, such as plasma membrane and tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporters, to couple the downhill movement of protons to the extrusion or sequestration of Na+ ions against their electrochemical potential gradient (Blumwald et al., 2000Go). Sequestration of NaCl into the vacuole also provides a metabolically inexpensive and abundant osmoticum by which plants maintain an osmotic potential to drive water uptake into cells (Blumwald et al., 2000Go).

Ionic or osmotic treatment often increases P-ATPase activity and mRNA expression with a concomitant rise in plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiport activity (Niu et al., 1993Go; Barkla et al., 1995Go). P-ATPase activation occurs rapidly presumably by covalent modification of the C-terminal domain and interaction with 14-3-3 proteins (Sze et al., 1999Go; Roberts, 2000Go). NaCl treatment also generally increases V-ATPase proton pumping activity and expression of individual V-ATPase subunit genes (see Ratajczak, 2000Go; Ratajczak and Wilkins, 2000Go). Parallel increases in tonoplast Na+/H+ antiport activity correlate with sites of highest Na+ accumulation within tissues suggesting that these transport processes are important determinants of salinity adaptation (Barkla et al., 2001Go).

The contribution of the V-PPiase activity to salinity stress adaptation has been more enigmatic. Recent experimentation in yeast, however, has demonstrated that V-PPiase overexpression can restore salt tolerance to a salt-sensitive ena1 mutant lacking plasma membrane Na+-ATPase activity (Gaxiola et al., 1999Go). Restoration of salt tolerance in this mutant was dependent upon Na+ and Cl influx, presumably into the endosome, via a Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX1) and a chloride channel (GEF1), respectively (Gaxiola et al., 1999Go), or extrusion of Na+ at the plasma membrane (Blumwald, 2000Go; Blumwald et al., 2000Go). These results clearly demonstrate the importance of V-PPiase activity in energizing transport processes required for salt tolerance. A second type of K+-insensitive, H+-PPiase gene (AVP2) has recently been described in plants, however, the subcellular distribution and functional roles of this class have not yet been established (Drozdowicz et al., 2000Go; Nakanishi and Maeshima, 2000Go).

The recent molecular characterization of Na+/H+ antiporters in yeast and higher plants has provided conclusive evidence for their roles in salinity adaptation. Gaxiola et al. (1999)Go cloned the vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Arabiopsis thaliana (AtNHX1) and showed that it can functionally substitute for a related endosomal antiport activity in yeast. A related salt-inducible, vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene has also been characterized in rice (Fukuda et al., 1999Go). Transgenic AtNHX1 overexpressing plants displayed higher vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter activity, greater amounts of AtNHX1 protein, and improved growth at elevated NaCl levels compared to wildtype plants, confirming the role of this vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter in salt tolerance (Apse et al., 1999Go).

Recently, a putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene has been isolated from Arabidopsis by positional cloning (Shi et al., 2000Go). This gene was originally identified as the SOS1 (salt overly sensitive) locus and plays a major role in salt tolerance (Zhu, 2000Go). SOS1 gene expression is induced by NaCl primarily in root cells surrounding the xylem suggesting that this Na+/H+ antiporter functions in loading Na+ into the xylem for long-distance transport to the shoots (Shi et al., 2000Go). Localization of SOS1 expression to the symplast/xylem interface is also consistent with the K+ transport defect of the sos1 mutant phenotype, if SOS1 function is linked to high affinity K+ transport by K+/H+ or K+/Na+ symport processes. The ability to coordinate salt exclusion and mobilization from roots with transport to and compartmentation in shoots appears to be a fundamental determinant of salt tolerance and represents an attractive target for engineering improved salt tolerance. Despite the importance of Na+/H+ antiporters, their activity ultimately depends on H+-ATPase and/or H+-PPiase proton pumping capacity. Therefore, future engineering strategies to improve Na+ partitioning by enhancing Na+/H+ antiport activity should include parallel improvements in proton pumping activities. This has not been attempted to date, however, presumably due to the complexity of V-ATPase subunit structure and the cell- and tissue-specific expression patterns of P-ATPase gene family members (Sze et al., 1999Go; Ratajczak, 2000Go; Ratajczak and Wilkins, 2000Go).


    WATER TRANSPORT AND OSMOREGULATION
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Together with ion and solute transporters, aquaporins or water channels, play essential roles in the regulation of water relations and osmotic balance within plant cells. Aquaporins are members of the major intrinsic protein (MIP) superfamily present in all organisms that facilitate the movement of water and other small molecules (e.g., urea, glycerol) through membranes. Water absorption by cells from the xylem is a key determinant of plant cell growth and elongation (Nonami, 1998Go). MIPs are abundant proteins localized to the plasma membrane, the tonoplast, or other endomembranes of plant cells (Chrispeels et al., 1999Go; Tyerman et al., 1999Go; Kjellbom et al., 1999Go; Johansson et al., 2000Go). Of the 30 MIPs identified in Arabidopsis, 12 are proposed to be PIPs (plasma membrane intrinsic proteins), 12 are proposed to be TIPs (tonoplast intrinsic proteins), and the remaining six NLMs (NOD26-like MIPs) (Weig et al., 1997Go; Schäffner, 1998Go; Johansson et al., 2000Go). Although not all of these MIPs have been functionally tested, most show water transport activity (Kjellbom et al., 1999Go; Johansson et al., 2000Go).

The expression patterns of various aquaporins, which are abundant in root epidermal, exodermal, and endodermal cells, phloem-associated cells, and xylem parenchymal cells, suggest they facilitate membrane permeability to water where there are anatomical constraints to water transport or where large water fluxes are known to occur (Yamada et al., 1995Go; Kaldenhoff et al., 1995Go; Barrieu et al., 1998Go; Yamada and Bohnert, 2000Go; Kirch et al., 2000Go). However, the functional significance of water channels in maintaining water balance under osmotic stress remains unclear. Under drought or salt stress conditions, transcript or protein abundance of some aquaporins are upregulated (Yamada et al., 1997Go; Uno et al., 1998Go; Kirch et al., 2000Go), whereas others are downregulated (Yamada et al., 1995Go; Kirch et al., 2000Go).

The transport activity of a putative plasma membrane aquaporin is regulated by reversible phosphorylation by a calcium-dependent protein kinase in a turgor-dependent manner (Johansson et al., 1998Go). Simulated drought conditions lower apoplastic water potential, thereby decreasing in vivo aquaporin phosphorylation, lowering plasma membrane water permeability, and minimizing water loss (Johansson et al., 1998Go). Other studies have suggested that transport of water via mercury-sensitive water channels actually increased in roots of rice plants subjected to artificial drought stress (Lu and Neumann, 1999Go). Differential distribution, turnover, and trafficking of aquaporins within endomembrane systems are also likely to modulate water flux during osmotic stress (Kirch et al., 2000Go). Antisense plants with reduced plasma membrane PIP expression compensated for reduced water permeability through the plasma membrane by increasing the size of their root system (Kaldenhoff et al., 1998Go). The osmotic water permeability of protoplasts prepared from these antisense plants was three times lower than wild-type protoplasts (Kaldenhoff et al., 1995Go). While these results clearly demonstrate the importance of aquaporins in water uptake, additional evidence for in vivo function of aquaporins is required to conclusively define their contribution to osmotic adaptation under stress conditions. Modification of the expression patterns or gating properties of selected aquaporins might represent possible targets for manipulating the control of water fluxes within plants.


    OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Most bacteria, alga, and plants accumulate various organic solutes such as sugars, cyclic and acyclic polyols, fructans, amino acids and amino acid derivatives, and quaternary amino and sulfonium compounds in response to desiccation, osmotic, or low temperature stress (Delauney and Verma, 1993Go; Bartels and Nelson, 1994Go; Bohnert and Jensen, 1996Go). Such organic solutes are collectively termed compatible solutes or osmolytes because they can accumulate to high concentrations within cells without impairing cellular function. As osmolytes, such compounds are thought to function, in part, by mass action to restore osmotic potential of the cytoplasm to drive water uptake to maintain cell turgor (Yancey et al., 1982Go; Stoop et al., 1996Go). These compounds may also counteract osmotic imbalances under conditions of low water potential or high ionic strength, protect or replace the water shell around proteins (Yancey et al., 1982Go; Galinski, 1993), and stabilize protein complexes and membranes (Murata et al., 1992Go; Papageorgiou and Murata, 1995Go). Although some osmolytes offer protection by osmotic effect, transgenic plants overexpressing biosynthetic enzymes for osmoprotectants, such as mannitol, glycine betaine, D-ononitol, or sorbitol, accumulate these substances in amounts too low to account for protective effects by osmotic mass action alone (Sheveleva et al., 1997a, bGo; Sakamoto et al., 1998Go; Huang et al., 2000Go). Investigations using transgenic plants overexpressing biosynthetic enzymes for selected osmoprotectants have revealed alternative modes of stress protection. For example, mannitol protects oxidation-sensitive cellular structures by reducing hydroxyl radical formation or scavenging reactive oxygen species (Shen et al., 1997a, bGo). Low concentrations of glycine betaine can improve salt and cold stress tolerance, possibly by protecting photosynthetic protein complexes (Holmström et al., 2000Go) and reducing lipid peroxidation of cell membranes (Chen et al., 2000Go). In addition, the transient accumulation of certain metabolites, such as proline, might serve as a safety valve to adjust cellular redox state during stress (Shen et al., 1999Go; Kuznetsov and Shevyakova, 1999Go). Other osmoprotectants, such as ectoine, trehalose, and fructan, appear to function through membrane stabilization (Pilon-Smits et al., 1995Go; Romero et al., 1997Go; Nakayama et al., 2000Go). The diverse function roles of osmoprotectants have made them favorite tools for genetic engineering improved osmotic stress tolerance (see Bohnert and Sheveleva, 1998Go; Hare et al., 1998Go; Nelson et al., 1998Go; Smirnoff, 1998Go; Nuccio et al., 1999Go; Bohnert and Shen, 1999Go; Sakamoto and Murata, 2000Go; Rathinasabapathi, 2000Go). Defining the exact mechanisms of protection and the specific macromolecules being protected will undoubtedly lead to further improvements in osmolyte-mediated protection strategies. Identification and utilization of novel osmoprotectants derived from stress-tolerant organisms will also aid in such improvements (Rathinasabapathi et al., 2000Go). Combinatorial engineering of more than one osmoprotectant and utilizing stress-inducible promoters to drive expression only under stress conditions should improve the efficacy of these approaches by reducing the metabolic costs of osmolyte production. More importantly, understanding how manipulating osmoprotectant biosynthesis influences metabolic flux through alterations in substrate supply, demand and transport within subcellular compartments will be crucial to optimizing their use in engineering strategies (Nuccio et al., 1998Go; Hare et al., 1998Go; Stephanopoulus, 1999Go; Huang et al., 2000Go; McNeil et al., 2000Go).


    OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND FUTURE CHALLENGES
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Bacterial, fungal, and plant cells share a set of common adaptive mechanisms for cellular osmotic and ionic stress tolerance. These adaptations, including ion transport, discrimination, and sequestration, the synthesis of osmoprotectants, oxidative stress protection, and metabolic "weak links," have become obvious targets for engineering strategies (Bohnert and Shen, 1999Go; Holmberg and Bülow, 1998Go; Nelson et al., 1998Go; Yeo, 1998Go; Smirnoff, 1998Go). In addition, molecular genetic and biochemical studies have now confirmed that a multitude of components participate in abiotic stress signaling pathways (Hasegawa et al., 2000Go; Zhu, 2000Go). Understanding these signaling-response networks and exploiting them for engineering improved abiotic stress tolerance will remain a major goal for the coming decades. However, progress towards this goal has already begun. Overexpression of stress-regulated transcription factors in transgenic plants has been shown to improve the freezing, drought, and salinity tolerance (Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998Go; Winicov and Bastola, 1999Go; Kasuga et al., 1999Go; Winicov, 2000Go). Similarly, the ectopic expression of regulatory factors, protein kinases, and protein phosphatases can enhance tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses (Pardo et al., 1998Go; Espinosa-Ruiz et al., 1999Go; Gisbert et al., 2000Go; Kovtun et al., 2000Go; Saijo et al., 2000Go). Generally, such "regulon" engineering approaches, using regulatory or signal transduction pathway intermediates, should be more efficient and effective than engineering strategies that utilize single endpoint determinants. Genomics approaches promise tremendous amounts of information about all osmotically induced genes. Combining information from genome-wide gene expression profiling with systematic mutational analysis of all candidate genes should permit a comprehensive understanding of the regulation and integration of osmoregulatory processes in plants (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000Go; Hasegawa et al., 2000Go). Such information will be indispensable to our ability to engineer more effective crop protection strategies to meet the agricultural demands of the 21st century.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The author would like to thank Mary Ann Cushman and Grant Cramer for their helpful comments on the manuscript. Research in the author's laboratory was supported by the National Science Foundation (IBN-9722285, DBI-9813330), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Grant No. 99-35100-7004), and the Oklahoma and Nevada Agricultural Experiment Stations.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 From the Symposium Osmoregulation: An Integrated Approach presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Comparative and Integrative Biology, 4–8 January 2000, at Atlanta, Georgia. Back

2 E-mail: jcushman{at}unr.edu Back


    References
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 OSMOREGULATORY MECHANISMS IN...
 HIGH- AND LOW-AFFINITY K+...
 CATION AND ANION SELECTIVE...
 SODIUM EXTRUSION AND...
 WATER TRANSPORT AND...
 OSMOLYTES AND OSMOPROTECTANTS
 OSMOREGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND...
 References
 
Amtmann, A., and D. Sanders. 1999. Mechanisms of Na+ uptake by plant cells. Adv. Bot. Res, 29:75-112.

Apse, M. P., G. S. Aharon, W. A. Snedden, and E. Blumwald. 1999. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science, 285:1256-1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barbier-Brygoo, H., M. Vinauger, J. Colcombet, G. Ephritikhine, J. Frachisse, and C. Maurel. 2000. Anion channels in higher plants: Functional characterization, molecular structure, and physiological role. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465:199-218.[Medline]

Barkla, B. J., L. Zingarelli, E. Blumwald, and J. A. C. Smith. 1995. Tonoplast Na+/H+ antiport activity and its energization by the vacuolar H+-ATPase in the halophytic plant M. crystallinum L. Plant Physiol, 109:549-556.[Abstract]

Barkla, B. J., R. Vera-Estrella, J. Camacho-Emiterio, and O. Pantoja. 2001. Na+/H+-antiport activity in the halophyte Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. is correlated to sites of Na+ storage. Planta. (In press).

Barrieu, F., F. Chamont, and M. J. Chrisppels. 1998. High expression of the tonoplast aquaporin ZmTIPa in epidermal and conducting tissues of maize. Plant Physiol, 117:1153-1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bartels, D., and D. E. Nelson. 1994. Approaches to improve stress tolerance using molecular genetics. Plant Cell Environ, 17:659-667.[CrossRef]

Blumwald, E. 2000. Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, 12:431-434.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Blumwald, E., G. S. Aharon, and M. P. Apse. 2000. Sodium transport in plant cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465:140-151.[Medline]

Bohnert, H. J., and R. G. Jensen. 1996. Strategies for engineering water-stress tolerance in plants. Trends Biotech, 14:89-97.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Bohnert, H. J., and B. Shen. 1999. Transformation and compatible solutes. Scientia Hort, 78:237-260.

Bohnert, H. J., and E. Sheveleva. 1998. Plant stress adaptations—making metabolism move. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 1:267-274.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bohnert, H. J., H. Su, and B. Shen. Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance. 1999. In K. Shinozaki (ed.), Cold, drought, heat, and salt stress: Molecular responses in higher plants, pp. 29–60. R. G. Landes, Austin, Texas.

Chen, W. P., P. H. Li, and T. H. H. Chen. 2000. Glycinebetaine increases chilling tolerance and reduces chilling-induced lipid peroxidation in Zea mays L. Plant Cell Environ, 23:609-618.[CrossRef]

Chrispeels, M. J., N. M. Crawford, and J. I. Schroeder. 1999. Proteins for transport of water and mineral nutrients across the membranes of plant cells. Plant Cell, 11:661-675.[Free Full Text]

Clemens, S., D. M. Antosiewicz, J. M. Ward, and D. P. Schachtman. 1998. The plant cDNA LCT1 mediates the uptake of calcium and cadmium in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 95:12043-12048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cushman, J. C., and H. J. Bohnert. 2000. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 3:117-124.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Czempinski, K., S. Zimmermann, T. Ehrhardt, and B. Mueller-Roeber. 1997. New structure and function in plant K+ channels: KCO1, an outward rectifier with a steep Ca+-dependency. EMBO J, 16:2565-2575.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Czempinski, K., N. Gaedeke, S. Zimmermann, and B. Mueller-Roeber. 1999. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of plant ion channels. J. Exp. Bot, 50:955-766.[Abstract]

Daram, P., S. Urcach, F. Gaymard, H. Sentenac, and I. Cherel. 1997. Tetramerization of the AKT1 plant potassium channel involves its c-terminal cytoplasmic domain. EMBO J, 16:3455-3463.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Davenport, R. J., and M. Tester. 2000. A weakly voltage-dependent, nonselective cation channel mediates toxic sodium influx in wheat. Plant Physiol, 122:823-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Delauney, A. J., and D. P. S. Verma. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J, 4:215-223.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Diatloff, E., R. Kumar, and D. P. Schachtman. 1998. Site directed mutagenesis reduces the Na+ affinity of HKT1, a Na+-energized high affinity K+ transporter. FEBS Lett, 432:31-36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Drozdowicz, Y. M., J. C. Kissinger, and P. A. Rea. 2000. AVP2, a sequence-divergent, K+-insensitive H+-translocating inorganic pyrophosphatase from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 123:353-362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Espinosa-Ruiz, A., J. M. Bellés, R. Serrano, and F. A. Culiáñez-Maciá. 1999. Arabidopsis thaliana AtHAL3: A flavoprotein related to salt and osmotic tolerance and plant growth. Plant J, 20:529-539.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Flowers, T. J., and A. R. Yeo. 1995. Breeding for salinity tolerance in crop plants: Where next? Aust. J. Plant Physiol, 22:875-884.

Flowers, T. J., M. L. Koyama, S. A. Flowers, C. Sudhakar, K. P. Singh, and A. R. Yeo. 2000. QTL: Their place in engineering tolerance of rice to salinity. J. Exp. Bot, 51:99-106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fu, H. H., and S. Luan. 1998. AtKuP1: A dual affinity K+ transporter from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 10:63-73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fukuda, A., A. Nakamura, and Y. Tanada. 1999. Molecular cloning and expression of the Na+/H+ exchanger gene in Oryza sativa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1446:3221-3228.

Galinski, E. A. 1993. Compatible solutes of halophilic eubacteria: Molecular principles, water soluble interactions, stress protection. Experientia, 49:487-495.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Gaxiola, R. A., R. Rao, A. Sherman, P. Grisafi, S. L. Alper, and G. R. Fink. 1999. The Arabidopsis thaliana proton transporters, AtNhx1 and Avp1, can function in cation detoxification in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 96:1480-1485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gaymard, F., G. Pilot, B. Lacombe, D. Bouchez, D. Bruneau, J. Boucherez, N. Michaux-Ferriere, J. B. Thibaud, and H. Sentenac. 1998. Identification and disruption of a plant shaker-like outward channel involved in K+ release into the xylem sap. Cell, 94:647-655.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gisbert, C., A. M. Rus, M. C. Bolarín, J. M. López-Coronado, I. Arrillaga, C. Montesinos, M. Caro, R. Serrano, and V. Moreno. 2000. The yeast HAL1 gene improves salt tolerance of transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol, 123:393-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glenn, E., J. J. Brown, and E. Blumwald. 1999. Salt-tolerant mechanisms and crop potential in halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci, 18:227-255.[CrossRef]

Hare, P. D., W. A. Cress, and J. Van Staden. 1998. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell Environ, 21:535-553.[CrossRef]

Hasegawa, P. M., R. A. Bressan, J.-K. Zhu, and H. J. Bohnert. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol, 51:463-499.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hirsch, R. E., B. D. Lewis, E. P. Spalding, and M. R. Sussman. 1998. A role for the AKT1 potassium channel in plant nutrition. Science, 280:918-921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holmberg, N., and L. Bülow. 1998. Improving stress tolerance in plants by gene transfer. Trends Plant Sci, 3:61-66.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Holmström, K.-O., S. Somersalo, A. Mandal, T. E. Palva, and B. Welin. 2000. Improved tolerance to salinity and low temperature in transgenic tobacco producing glycine betaine. J. Exp. Bot, 51:177-185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang, J., R. Hirji, L. Adam, K. L. Rozwadowski, J. K. Hammerlindl, W. A. Keller, and G. Selvaraj. 2000. Genetic engineering of glycine betaine production toward enhancing stress tolerance in plants: Metabolic limitations. Plant Physiol, 122:747-756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jaglo-Ottosen, K. R., S. J. Gilmour, D. G. Zarka, O. Schabenberger, and M. F. Thomashow. 1998. Arabiopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science, 280:104-106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johansson, I., M. Karlsson, V. K. Shukla, M. J. Chrispeels, C. Larsson, and P. Kjellbom. 1998. Water transport activity of the plasma membrane aquaporin PM28A is regulated by phosphorylation. Plant J, 10:451-459.

Johansson, I., M. Karlsson, U. Johanson, C. Larsson, and P. Kjellbom. 2000. The role of aquaporins in cellular and whole plant water balance. Bioch. Biophys. Acta, 1465:324-342.[Medline]

Kaldenhoff, R., A. Kölling, J. Meyers, U. Karmann, G. Ruppel, and G. Richter. 1995. The blue light-responsive AthH2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana is primarily expressed in expanding as well as differentiating cells and encodes a putative channel protein of the plasmalemma. Plant J, 7:87-95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kaldenhoff, R., K. Grote, J.-J. Zhu, and U. Zimmermann. 1998. Significance of plasmalemma aquaporins for water transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J, 14:121-128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kasuga, M., Q. Liu, M. Setsuko, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 1999. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotechnol, 17:287-291.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kim, E. J., J. M. Kwak, N. Uozumi, and J. L. Schroeder. 1998. AtKUP1: An Arabidopsis gene encoding high-affinity potassium transport activity. Plant Cell, 10:51-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kirch, H.-H., R. Vera-Estrella, D. Golldack, F. Quigley, C. B. Michalowski, B. J. Barkla, and H. J. Bohnert. 2000. Expression of water channel proteins in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Physiol, 123:111-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kjellbom, P., C. Larsson, I. Johansson, M. Karlsson, and U. Johanson. 1999. Aquaporins and water homeostasis in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 4:308-314.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Köhler, C., M. Thomas, and G. Neuhaus. 1999. Characterization of a novel gene family of putative cyclic nucleotide- and calmodulin-regulated ion channels in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J, 18:97-104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kovtun, Y., W.-L. Chiu, G. Tena, and J. Sheen. 2000. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 97:2940-2945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krol, E., and K. Trebacz. 2000. Ways of ion channel gating in plant cells. Ann. Bot, 86:449-469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuznetsov, V. V., and N. I. Shevyakova. 1999. Proline under stress: Biological role, metabolism, and regulation. Russ. J. Plant Physiol, 46:274-287.

Lacombe, B., G. Pilot, F. Gaymard, H. Sentenac, and J. B. Thibaud. 2000a.. pH control of the plant outwardly-rectifying potassium channel SKOR. FEBS Lett, 466:351-354.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lacombe, B., G. Pilot, E. Michard, F. Gaymard, H. Sentenac, and J. B. Thibaud. 2000b.. A shaker-like K(+) channel with weak rectification is expressed in both source and sink phloem tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 12:837-851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lu, Z., and P. M. Neumann. 1999. Water stress inhibits hydraulic conductance and leaf growth in rice seedlings by not the transport of water via mercury-sensitive water channels in the root. Plant Physiol, 120:143-151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maathuis, F. J. M., and A. Amtmann. 1999. K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: The basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann. Bot, 84:123-133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maduke, M., C. Miller, and J. A. Mindell. 2000. A decade of CLC chloride channels: Structure, mechanism, and many unsettling questions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct, 29:411-438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maeshima, M. 2000. Vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase. Bioch. Biophys. Acta, 1465:37-51.[Medline]

McNeil, S. D., M. L. Nuccio, D. Rhodes, Y. Shachar-Hill, and A. D. Hanson. 2000. Radiotracer and computer modeling evidence that phospho-base methylation is the main route of choline biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 123:371-380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morsomme, P., and M. Boutry. 2000. The plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase: Structure, function, and regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465:1-16.[Medline]

Munns, R. 2001. Salinity, growth and phytohomones. In A. Laüchli and U. Lüttge (eds.), Salinity: Environment—plants—molecules, Klewer Academic Publishers, Inc., Netherlands. (In press).

Murata, N., P. S. Mohanty, H. Hayashi, and G. C. Papageorgiou. 1992. Glycinebetaine stalizes the association of extrinsic proteins with the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving complex. FEBS Lett, 296:187-189.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nakanishi, Y., and M. Maeshima. 2000. Isolation of a cDNA for a H+-pyrophosphatase-like protein from Arabidopsis [accession no. AB034696] and its functional expression in yeast [PGR 00-026]. Plant Physiol, 122:985.[Free Full Text]

Nakayama, H., K. Yoshida, H. Ono, Y. Murooka, and A. Shinmyo. 2000. Ectoine, the compatible solute of Halomonas elongata, confers hyperosmotic tolerance in cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol, 122:1239-1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nelson, D., B. Shen, and H. B. Bohnert. 1998. Salinity tolerance—mechanisms, models, and the metabolic engineering of complex traits. In J. K. Setlow (ed.), Genetic engineering, principles and methods, Vol. 20, pp. 153–176. Plenum Press, New York.

Niu, X., M. L. Narasimhan, R. A. Salzman, R. A. Bressan, and P. M. Hasegawa. 1993. NaCl regulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene expression in a glycophyte and a halophyte. Plant Physiol, 103:713-718.[Abstract]

Nonami, H. 1998. Plant water relations and control of cell elongation at low water potentials. J. Plant Res, 111:373-382.[CrossRef]

Nuccio, M. L., B. L. Russell, K. D. Nolte, B. Rathinasabapathi, D. A. Gage, and A. D. Hanson. 1998. The endogenous choline supply limits glycine betaine sysnthesis in transgenic tobacco expressing choline monooxygenase. Plant J, 16:487-796.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nuccio, M. L., D. Rhodes, S. D. McNeil, and A. D. Hanson. 1999. Metabolic engineering of plants for osmotic stress resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 2:128-134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Papageorgiou, G. C., and N. Murata. 1995. The unusually strong stabilizing effects of glycinebetaine on the structure and function in the oxygen-evolving photosystem II complex. Photosyn. Res, 44:243-252.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pardo, J. M., M. P. Reddy, S. Yang, A. Maggio, G. H. Huh, T. Matsumoto, M. A. Coca, M. Paino-D'Urzo, H. Kiowa, D. Y. Yun, A. A. Watad, R. A. Bressan, and P. M. Hasegawa. 1998. Stress signaling through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase calcineurin mediates salt adaptation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 95:9681-9686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pilon-Smits, E. A. H., M. J. M. Ebskamp, M. J. Paul, M. J. W. Jeuken, P. J. Weisbeek, and S. C. M. Smeekens. 1995. Improved performance of transgenic fructan-accumulating tobacco under drought stress. Plant Physiol, 107:125-130.[Abstract]

Quintero, F. J., and M. R. Blatt. 1997. A new family of K+ transporters from Arabidopsis that are conserved across phyla. FEBS Lett, 415:206-211.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ratajczak, R. 2000. Structure, function and regulation of the plant vacuolar H+-translocating ATPase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465:17-26.[Medline]

Ratajczak, R., and T. A. Wilkins. 2000. Energizing the tonoplast. In D. G. Robinson and J. C. Rogers (eds.), Annual plant review, pp. 133–173. Sheffield Acad. Press, Sheffield, UK.

Rathinasabapathi, B. 2000. Metabolic engineering for stress tolerance: Installing osmoprotectant synthesis pathways. Ann. Bot, 86:709-716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rathinasabapathi, B., C. Siqua, J. Ho, and D. A. Gage. 2000. Osmoprotectane ß-alanine betaine synthesis in the Plumbaginaceae: S-adenosyl-L-methionine dependent N-methylation of ß-alanine to its betaine is via N-methyl and N,N-dimethyl ß-alanines. Physiol. Plant, 109:225-231.

Roberts, M. R. 2000. Regulatory 14-3-3 protein-protein interactions in plant cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 3:400-405.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Romero, C., J. M. Belles, J. L. Vaya, R. Serrano, and F. A. Culianez-Macia. 1997. Expression of the yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene in transgenic tobacco plants: Pleotropic phenoyptes include drought tolerance. Planta, 201:293-297.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rubio, F., W. Gassman, and J. I. Schroeder. 1996. High-affinity potassium uptake in plants. Science, 273:978-979.[Free Full Text]

Rubio, F., M. Schwarz, W. Gassman, and J. I. Schroeder. 1999. Genetic selection of mutations in the high affinity K+ transporter HKT1 that define functions of a loop site for reduced Na+ permeability and increased Na+ tolerance. J. Biol. Chem, 274:6839-6847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saijo, Y., S. Hata, J. Kyozuka, K. Shimamoto, and K. Izui. 2000. Over-expression of a single Ca2+-dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant J, 23:319-327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sakamoto, A., A. Murata, and N. Murata. 1998. Metabolic engineering of rice leading to biosynthesis of glycinebetaine and tolerance to salt and cold. Plant Molec. Biol, 38:1011-1019.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sakamoto, A., and N. Murata. 2000. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in plants: Current status and implications for enhancement of stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot, 51:81-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Santa-María, G., F. Rubio, J. Dubcovsky, and A. Rodriguez-Navarro. 1997. The HAK1 gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter. Plant Cell, 9:2281-2289.[Abstract]

Schachtmnan, D., and W. Liu. 1999. Molecular pieces to the puzzle of the interaction between potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 4:281-286.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schachtman, D., R. Kumar, J. I. Schroeder, and E. L. Marcsh. 1997. Molecular and functional characterization of a novel low-affinity cation transporter (LCT1) in higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 94:11079-11084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schachtman, D. P. 2000. Molecular insights into the structure and function of plant K+ transport mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465:127-139.[Medline]

Schäffner, A. R. 1998. Aquaporin function, structure, and expression: Are there more surprises to surface in water relations? Planta, 204:131-139.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schroeder, J. I. 1995. Anion channels as central mechanisms for signal transduction in guard cells and putative functions in roots for plant-soil interactions. Plant Mol. Biol, 28:353-361.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schuurink, R. C., S. F. Shartzer, A. Fath, and R. L. Jones. 1998. Characterization of a calmodulin-binding transporter from the plasma membrane of barley aleurone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 95:1944-1949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seckler, D., U. Amarasinghe, D. Molden, R. da Silva, and R. Barker. 1998. World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: Scenarios and issues. IWMI Research Report 19, Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI.

Shen, B., R. G. Jensen, and H. J. Bohnert. 1997a.. Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic plants by targeting mannitol biosynthesis to chloroplasts. Plant Physiol, 113:1177-1183.[Abstract]

Shen, B., R. G. Jensen, and H. J. Bohnert. 1997b.. Mannitol protects against oxidation by hydroxyl radicals. Plant Physiol, 115:527-532.[Abstract]

Shen, B., S. Hohmann, R. G. Jensen, and H. J. Bohnert. 1999. Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation. Replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiol, 121:45-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sheveleva, E., W. Chmara, H. J. Bohnert, and R. G. Jensen. 1997a.. Increased salt and drought tolerance by D-ononitol production in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Physiol, 115:1211-1219.[Abstract]

Sheveleva, E., S. Marquez, W. Chmara, A. Zegeer, R. G. Jensen, and H. J. Bohnert. 1997b.. Sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in transgenic tabacco. High amounts of sorbitol lead to necrotic lesions. Plant Physiol, 117:831-839.

Shi, H., M. Ishitani, C. Kim, and J.-K. Zhu. 2000. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 97:6896-6901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Skerett, M., and D. Tyerman. 1994. A channel that allows inwardly directed fluxes of anions in protoplasts derived from wheat roots. Planta, 192:295-305.[Web of Science]

Smirnoff, N. 1998. Plant resistance to environmental stress. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol, 9:214-219.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Spalding, E. P., R. E. Hirsch, D. R. Lewis, Q. Zhi, M. R. Sussman, and B. D. Lewis. 1999. Potassium uptake supporting plant growth in the absence of AKT1 channel activity. Inhibition by ammonium and stimulation by sodium. J. Gen. Physiol, 113:909-918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stephanopoulos, G. 1999. Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metabolic Engineer, 1:1-11.

Stoop, J. M. H., J. D. Williamson, and D. M. Pharr. 1996. Mannitol metabolism in plants: A method for coping with stress. Trends Plant Sci, 1:139-144.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Sze, H., X. Li, and M. G. Palmgren. 1999. Energization of plant cell membranes by H+-pumping ATPases: Regulation and biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 11:677-689.[Free Full Text]

Tyerman, S. D., M. Skerrett, A. Garrill, G. P. Findlay, and R. A. Leigh. 1997. Pathways for the permeation of Na and Cl into protoplasts from the cortex of wheat roots. J. Exp. Bot, 48:459-480.[Web of Science]

Tyerman, S. D., and I. M. Skerrett. 1999. Root ion channels and salinity. Sci. Hortic, 78:175-235.

Tyerman, S., H. J. Bohnert, C. Maurel, E. Steudle, and J. A. C. Smith. 1999. Plant aquaporins: Their molecular biology, biophysics and significance for plant water relations. J. Exp. Bot, 50:1055-1071.[Abstract]

Uno, Y., T. Urao, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, M. Kanechi, N. Inagaki, S. Maekawa, and K. Shinozaki. 1998. Early salt-stress effects on expression of genes for aquaporin homologues in the halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.). J. Plant Res, 111:411-419.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Uozumi, N., E. J. Kim, F. Rubio, T. Yamaguchi, S. Muto, A. Tsuboi, E. P. Bakker, T. Nakamura, and J. I. Schroeder. 2000. The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward Na+ currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and Na+ Uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol, 122:1249-1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Urbach, S., I. Cherel, H. Sentenac, and F. Gaymard. 2000. Biochemical characterization of the Arabidopsis K+ channels KAT1 and AKT1 expressed or co-expressed in insect cells. Plant J, 23:527-538.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Weig, A., C. Deswarte, and M. J. Chrispeels. 1997. The major intrinsic protein family of Arabidopsis has 23 members that form three distinct groups with functional aquaporins in each group. Plant Physiol, 114:1347-1357.[Abstract]

Wegner, L., and K. Raschke. 1994. Ion channels in the xylem parenchyma of barley roots: A procedure to isolate protoplasts from this tissue and a patch-clamp exploration of salt passageways into xylem vessels. Plant Physiol, 105:799-813.[Abstract]

White, P. J. 1999. The molecular mechanism of sodium influx to root cells. Trends Plant Sci, 4:245-246.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Winicov, I. 2000. Alfin1 transcription factor overexpression enhances plant root growth under normal and saline conditions and improves salt tolerance in alfalfa. Planta, 210:416-422.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Winicov, I., and D. R. Bastola. 1999. Transgenic overexpression of the transcription factor Alfinl enhances expression of the endogenous MsPRP2 gene in Alfalfa and improves salinity tolerance of the plants. Plant Physiol, 120:473-480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xiong, L., M. Ishitani, and J.-K. Zhu. 1999. Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature, and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 119:205-211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, S., and H. J. Bohnert. 2000. Expression of the PIP aquaporin promoter-MipA from the common ice plant. Plant Cell Physiol, 41:719-725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, S., M. Katsuhara, W. B. Kelly, C. B. Michalowski, and H. J. Bohnert. 1995. A family of transcripts encoding water channel proteins: Tissue-specific expression in the common ice plant. Plant Cell, 7:1129-1142.[Abstract]

Yamada, S., T. Komori, P. N. Myers, S. Kuwata, T. Kubo, and S. Imaseki. 1997. Expression of plasma membrane water channel genes under water stress in Nicotiana excelsior. Plant Cell Physiol, 38:1226-1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yancey, P. H., M. E. Clark, S. C. Hand, R. D. Bowlus, and G. C. Somero. 1982. Living with water stress: Evolution of osmolyte systems. Science, 217:1214-1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yeo, A. 1998. Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole plant physiology. J. Exp. Bot, 49:915-929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu, J.-K. 2000. Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol, 124:941-948.[Free Full Text]

Zimmermann, S., and H. Sentenac. 1999. Plant ion channels: From molecular structures to physiological functions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 2:477-482.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zimmermann, S., T. Ehrhardt, G. Plesch, and B. Müller-Röber. 1999. Ion channels in plant signalling. Cell Mol. Life Sci, 55:183-203.[CrossRef][Web of Science]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cushman, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?