Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005 45(1):33-38; doi:10.1093/icb/45.1.33
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology

Impacts of Xenobiotics on Crustacean Molting: The Invisible Endocrine Disruption1

Enmin Zou2,1
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310


    SYNOPSIS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING...
 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 References
 
Aquatic pollution has led to the accumulation of various xenobiotics in crustaceans. A number of these environmental chemicals have been found to interfere with molting of crustaceans. Results of initial mechanistic studies with Uca pugilator suggest that the disruption of molting results from the disturbance to the Y-organ-ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) axis by xenobiotics. Such disturbance to the Y-organ-EcR axis can be caused by interference with epidermal ecdysteroid signaling and/or alterations in ecdysteroidogenesis and/or ecdysteroid disposition. Because the adverse impacts on crustacean molting cannot be readily seen in the wild, the disruption of molting represents an invisible form of endocrine disruption.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING...
 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 References
 
Because of agricultural and industrial activities, aquatic environments are increasingly contaminated with various kinds of pollutants, many of which can interfere with hormonal signaling in vertebrates. Through feeding and direct uptake from water and sediments, these endocrine-disrupting contaminants have been found to accumulate in crustaceans living in various aquatic environments. Because of the generally high lipophilicity of organochlorine compounds, these organic contaminants can readily accumulate in the fatty tissue, such as hepatopancreas, of crustaceans. For instance, Mattig et al. (1997)Go reported the accumulation of organochlorine compounds, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanes (DDTs), hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs), and hexachlorobenzene (HCB), in the shore crab, Carcinus maenas, and the sand shrimp, Crangon crangon. Organochlorine contaminants, including toxaphene, chlordane and metabolites, HCHs, HCB, dieldrin, and PCBs, were found in the opossum shrimp, Mysis relicta, from the great lakes (Kucklick and Baker, 1998Go). Heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, endosulfan, chlordane, DDT and metabolites, and HCHs were found to accumulate in the burrowing crab, Chasmagnathus granulata (Menone et al., 2000Go). Borga et al. (2002)Go detected DDTs, PCBs, chlordance, HCB, and HCH in several amphipods from the Arctic Ocean. PCBs, DDTs and metabolites, endosulfan, heptachlor epoxide, HCHs, and HCB were detected in the tissues of the amphipod, Gammarus lacustris, inhabiting a high-altitude lake (Blais et al., 2003Go). Like organochlorines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the pollutants from activities of petroleum and smelter industries, are also highly lipophilic and can easily accumulate in crustaceans tissues (Kayal and Connell, 1995Go; Eickhoff et al., 2003Go). Besides, cadmium, a metal capable of disrupting estrogen functions in vertebrates (Le Guevel et al., 2000Go), has been found to accumulate in the tissues of crustaceans in appreciable quantities (Paez-Osuna and Tron-Mayen, 1996Go; Mattig et al., 1997Go; Mouneyrac et al., 2001Go; Turoczy et al., 2001Go).

Earlier, the possibilities of the adverse effect of environmental chemicals on crustacean molting had been investigated. Weis and Mantel (1976)Go found a stimulatory effect of p,p' DDT on molting of Uca pugilator. Fingerman and Fingerman (1977)Go reported the inhibitory effect of the PCB mixture Aroclor 1242, on molting of Uca pugilator. Schimmel et al. (1979)Go found that blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, fed oysters contaminated with kepone, molt less frequently than crabs fed kepone-free oysters. Aromatic hydrocarbons benzene (Cantelmo et al., 1981Go) and dimethylnaphthalene (Cantelmo et al., 1982Go) were found to delay the molting of juvenile Callinectes sapidus. In recent years, with the emergence of a new subdiscipline of ecotoxicology, endocrine disruption, also called environmental signaling (McLachlan, 2001Go), new attention is being paid to the disrupting effects of environmental chemicals on crustacean molting. More molt-interfering chemicals have been identified and the pervasiveness of molt-inhibition by xenobiotics has been reexamined. Zou and Fingerman (1997a)Go, in their study on the effects of vertebrate endocrine disruptors on sex differentiation in Daphnia magna, found that estrogenic agents diethylstilbestrol (DES) and endosulfan do not affect male differentiation but delay the molting of this cladoceran. A further study by these investigators found that other environmental chemicals, such as Aroclor 1242, 2,4,5-trichlorobiphenyl (PCB29), and diethyl phthalate, can also inhibit molting of Daphnia magna (Zou and Fingerman, 1997bGo). Baer and Owens (1999)Go found that the pesticide methoxychlor delays the molting of Daphnia magna. Snyder and Mulder (2001)Go reported that exposure of Homarus americanus larvae to the cyclodiene pesticide heptachlor can cause a delay in molting. Molt-inhibition by heavy metal cadmium has also been reported in the estuarine crab, Chasmagnathus granulata (Rodriguez Moreno et al., 2003Go).


    ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING XENOBIOTICS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING...
 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 References
 
As is mentioned above, a number of xenobiotics that readily accumulate in the tissues of crustaceans can adversely impact molting in crustaceans. Now, the question is: how is crustacean molting adversely affected by environmental chemicals? To seek an answer to such a question, we must first examine the endocrine control of molting in crustaceans. Since the endocrine system for regulation of molting in decapods is best understood, only the endocrine control for molting of these animals is described.

Molting in crustaceans is regulated by a multi-hormonal system, but is under immediate control of the steroid hormones called ecdysteroids (Chang et al., 1993Go). In decapods, ecdysteroids are produced in the Y-organs whose activity is held in abeyance during the intermolt stage by the molt-inhibiting hormone (MIH) from the X-organ-sinus gland complex (Fig. 1). When the animal enters premolt stage, this inhibition of Y-organ activity by the MIH is lifted and ecdysteroidogenesis in the Y-organs intensifies. Ecdysteroid titer in the hemolymph is, as a result, elevated. Ecdysteroids regulate gene activities at the transcriptional level through interacting with the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR), which then heterodimerize with crustacean retinoid X receptor (RXR) (Durica and Hopkins, 1996Go; Chung et al., 1998Go). This EcR/crustacean RXR dimer binds to the DNA response elements of the genes regulated by the molting hormones.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Hormonal control of molting in decapod crustaceans.

 
In theory, any event (MIH synthesis and release, ecdysteroidogenesis, EcR binding, etc.) in the endocrine cascades of molting regulation (Fig. 1) could be the target of environmental chemicals. To unravel the mechanisms for molt-inhibition, Zou and Fingerman (1999aGo, b)Go have taken a backtracking approach. These investigators reasoned that wherever a xenobiotic attacks on this hormonal system the impacts should be manifested at the terminal event, the expression of the genes regulated by the molting hormones. Thus, alterations in expression of these molting hormone-regulated genes reflect the overall impacts of an environmental agent on the endocrine system for molting control.

Among the products of ecdysteroids-regulated genes are the enzymes responsible for exoskeleton degradation. Chitobiase, also known as N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase, is one of the two chitinolytic enzymes found in the molting fluid, which are required for complete degradation of exoskeletonal chitin. Chitobiase has been proven to be a product of the gene regulated by the molting hormones in a crustacean. Chitobiase activity was found to correlate well with the profiles of ecdsyeroids during the molting cycle of Uca pugilator (Table 1). Injection of the molting hormone 20-hydroxyecdsyone resulted in a significant increase in epidermal chitobiase activity (Fig. 2). In their endeavors to elucidate the mechanisms for molt-inhibition by xenobiotics, Zou and Fingerman (1999aGo, b)Go investigated the alterations in chitobiase activity following exposure to various molt-inhibiting agents. The inhibition of chitobiase activity appears to be a general response of Uca pugilator to the exposure to molt-interfering agents. Seven-day exposure of Uca pugilator to molt-inhibiting agents Aroclor 1242, PCB29, DES, endosulfan, and diethyl phthalate resulted in decreased chitobiase activity in the epidermis (Figs. 3 and 4). This inhibition of epidermal chitobiase activity can at least partly explain the slowing of molting caused by these xenobiotics because this enzyme is indispensable for complete digestion of exoskeletonal chitin. Zou and Fingerman (1998Go, 1999b)Go proposed that the inhibition of chitobiase activity by these chemical agents strongly suggests that exposure to these xenobiotics can disturb the Y-organ-EcR axis in view of the fact that chitobiase is apparently the product of the gene regulated by the molting hormones and that none of these xenobiotics are capable of inhibiting chitobiase activity in vitro (Fig. 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Chitobiase activity in the epidermis and ecdysteroid titer during the molting cycle of Uca pugilator.*

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Induction of chitobiase activity in the epidermis of female Uca pugilator in premolt substage D1 by two injections of 20-hydroxyecdysone at 25 µg/g live weight. Enzymatic activity is presented as nmol methylumbelliferone liberated·mg protein–1·10 min–1. **P < 0.01. Error bars represent standard deviation. N is shown in parentheses. Data from Zou and Fingerman (1999d)Go

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effects of three and seven day exposure to Aroclor 1242, endosulfan and diethylstilbestrol (DES) on chitobiase activity in the epidermis of Uca pugilator. Enzymatic activity is presented as nmol methylumbelliferone liberated·mg protein–1·12 min–1. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Error bars represent standard deviation. N is shown in parentheses. Data from Zou and Fingerman (1999a)Go

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effects of three and seven day exposure to diethyl phthalate and PCB29 on chitobiase activity in the epidermis of Uca pugilator. Enzymatic activity is presented as nmol methylumbelliferone liberated·mg protein–1·12 min–1. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Error bars represent standard deviation. N is shown in parentheses. Data from Zou and Fingerman (1999b)Go

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effects in vitro of Aroclor 1242, endosulfan, diethylstilbestrol (DES), PCB29, and diethyl phthalate on activity of chitobiase prepared from the epidermis of Uca pugilator. Controls contain 0.7% v/v acetone used as the carrier. Enzymatic activity is presented as nmol methylumbelliferone liberated·mg protein–1·12 min–1. Error bars represent standard deviation. N = 4

 
The backtracking approach adopted by Zou and Fingerman (1999aGo, b)Go has shed some light on the mechanisms for inhibition of crustacean molting by xenobiotics. Now the question becomes how the Y-organ-EcR axis can be disturbed by xenobiotics. There are basically two possible action routes, one being that environmental chemicals act through interfering the ecdysteroid signaling in the epidermis and the other is the alterations in ecdysteroidogenesis and/or ecdysteroid disposition by environmental chemicals.

Xenobiotics may interfere with ecdysteroid signaling in the epidermal cells through direct binding to the EcR owing to the fact that the EcRs have been shown to be not strict about their ligands and can be activated by other steroid compounds (Spindler et al., 1992Go) and even by nonsteroidal chemicals (Wing, 1988Go; Sohi et al., 1995Go). This possibility has recently been proven by the finding of Dinan et al. (2001)Go. Using an ecdysteroid-responsive cell line from Drosophila melanogaster as the assay system, combined with an EcR binding experiment, these investigators found that diethyl phthalate, a chemical capable of slowing molting of Daphnia magna and inhibiting chitobiase activity in Uca pugilator, is an antagonist of the EcR. Thus, the antagonistic actions on the EcR can at least partly account for the molt-disrupting effects of diethyl phthalate. More screenings are needed to examine whether other xenobiotics, particularly those frequently accumulating in crustacean tissues, can also interact with the EcR.

Ecdysteroid signaling in the epidermis could also be disrupted by environmental chemicals through other mechanisms than direct interactions with the EcR. Besides activation by their respective natural ligands, vertebrate steroid hormone receptors, such as androgen receptor (AR) (Darne et al., 1998Go), estrogen receptor (ER) (Ignar-Trowbridge et al., 1992Go) and progesterone receptor (PR) (Bai et al., 1997Go), can also be activated in a ligand-independent manner. Recently, it has been demonstrated that ß-HCH, an organochlorine with no affinity to the estrogen receptor (ER), is capable of activating the ER through a signaling pathway involving the membrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) c-ErbB2 and p44/42 MAP kinase (Hatakeyama et al., 2002Go). Such ligand-independent activation mechanisms may also exist in crustaceans considering the conservativeness of major pathways of signal transduction, such as the insulin signaling pathway (Claeys et al., 2002Go), in animals. Although their crustacean counterparts have yet to be characterized, the membrane-bound RTKs, such as Torso (Perrimon et al., 1995Go), Sevenless (Raabe, 2000Go) and the Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor DER (Shilo, 2003Go), have been reported in insects. Investigations on the likelihood of crustacean EcR being activated by environmental chemicals in a ligand-independent manner would only be possible after the delineation of signaling pathways leading to EcR activation.

The disturbance to the Y-organ-EcR axis may also occur as a result of alterations in ecdysteroidogenesis in the Y-organs and/or ecdysteroid disposition by xenobiotics. Very little is known about the direct impacts of environmental chemicals on the synthesis of ecdysteroids in the Y-organs. Rodriguez Moreno et al. (2003)Go recently found that exposure of the eyestalk-ablated Chasmagnathus granulata to cadmium inhibits molting of this crab, which presumably results from the direct attack of this metal on the Y-organs. Activities of Y-organs could also be affected indirectly by changes in synthesis and/or release of the MIH from the X-organ sinus gland complex. If a xenobiotic stimulates the synthesis and release of the MIH, the ecdysteroidogenesis would be expected to decrease, whereas an inhibitory effect of an environmental agent on the X-organ-sinus complex would result in an intensification of the Y-organ activities.

Attempts have been made to look into the effects of xenobiotics on enzymatic system responsible for ecdysteroid metabolism. Exposure of Daphnia magna to nonyphenol, while they are also exposed to testosterone, can inhibit the metabolic elimination of glucose- and sulfate-conjugated testosterone, thereby leading to increased accumulation of testosterone (Baldwin et al., 1997Go, 1998Go). Oberdörster et al. (1998)Go found that sublethal exposure of Daphnia magna to tributyltin does not affect molting but increases the production of hydroxylated, reduced/dehydrogenated, and glucose-conjugated metabolites of exogenous testosterone. However, it is still not known whether the testosterone-metabolizing enzymes are also involved in ecdysteroid metabolism in crustaceans. Snyder (1998)Go reported a new cytochrome P450 member, CYP45, in the lobster Homarus americanus, whose expression in the hepatopancreas correlates well with the profile of ecdysteroid titer during the molting cycle. Hepatopancreatic CYP45 was found to be inducible by the exogenous molting hormone, suggesting the possible involvement of this enzyme in ecdysteroid metabolism and other molting-related events. Snyder and Mulder (2001)Go observed that exposure of Homarus americanus larvae to heptachlor results in modulations in CYP45 expression and ecdysteroid levels. This shift in ecdysteroid profile is attributed to the slowing of larval molting caused by this pesticide.


    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING...
 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 References
 
Unlike the disrupting effects on sexual development, which are usually easily seen, the adverse effects of environmental contaminants on crustacean molting are not readily visible and may have been going on in the wild unnoticed in view of the fact that aquatic environments are increasingly contaminated with various kinds of xenobiotics and many of these contaminants can accumulate in crustacean tissues. Therefore, the disruption of molting by xenobiotics represents an invisible form of endocrine disruption.

Molting is a very important physiological process for crustaceans because it not only allows for growth and development for these animals bearing a rigid, confining exoskeleton but is also tied to metamorphosis during the early stages of the life cycle and reproduction during the adult stage. More environmental xenobiotics should be tested for their abilities to interfere with crustacean molting. In this regard, a screening assay that can be used to detect molt-interfering effects of xenobiotics is urgently needed. Mechanistic studies, especially ecdysteroid signaling disruption in the epidermal cells and alterations in ecdysteroid synthesis and disposition, should also be carried out.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 From the Symposium EcoPhysiology and Conservation: The Conservation of Endocrinology and Immunology presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 5–9 January 2004, at New Orleans, Louisiana. Back

2 E-mail: em.zou{at}nicholls.edu Back


    References
 TOP
 SYNOPSIS
 INTRODUCTION
 ACTION ROUTES OF MOLT-DISRUPTING...
 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 References
 
Baer, K. N., and K. D. Owens. 1999. Evaluation of selected endocrine disrupting compounds on sex determination in Daphnia magna using reduced photoperiod and different feeding rates. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 62:214-221.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bai, W., B. G. Rowan, V. E. Allgood, B. W. O'Malley, and N. L. Weigel. 1997. Differential phosphorylation of chicken progesterone receptor in hormone-dependent and ligand-independent activation. J. Biol. Chem, 272:10457-10463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baldwin, W. S., S. E. Graham, D. Shea, and G. A. LeBlanc. 1997. Metabolic androgenization of female Daphnia magna by the xenoestrogen 4-nonylphenol. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 16:1905-1911.[CrossRef]

Baldwin, W. S., S. E. Graham, D. Shea, and G. A. LeBlanc. 1998. Altered metabolic elimination of testosterone and associated toxicity following exposure of Daphnia magna to nonylphenol polyethoxylate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 39:104-111.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Blais, J. M., F. Wilhelm, K. A. Kidd, D. C. G. Muir, D. B. Donald, and D. W. Schindler. 2003. Concentrations of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in amphipods (Gammarus lacustris) along an elevation gradient in mountain lakes of western Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 22:2605-2613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Borga, K., B. Gulliksen, G. W. Gabrielsen, and J. U. Skaare. 2002. Size-related bioaccumulation and between-year variation of organochlorines in ice-associated amphipods from the Arctic Ocean. Chemosphere, 46:1383-1392.[Medline]

Cantelmo, A., R. Lazell, and L. Mantel. 1981. The effects of benzene on molting and limb regeneration in juvenile Callinectes sapidus. Mar. Biol. Lett, 2:333-343.

Cantelmo, A., L. Mantel, R. Lazell, F. Hospod, E. Flynn, S. Goldberg, and M. Katz. 1982. The effects of benzene and dimethylnaphthalene on physiological processes in juveniles of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. In W. Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F. P. Thurburg, and F. J. Vernberg (eds.), Physiological mechanisms of marine pollutant toxicity, pp.349–389. Academic Press, New York.

Chang, E. S., M. J. Bruce, and S. L. Tamone. 1993. Regulation of crustacean molting: A multihormonal system. Am. Zool, 33:324-329.

Chung, A. C.-K., D. S. Durica, S. W. Clifton, B. A. Roe, and P. Hopkins. 1998. Cloning of crustacean ecdysteroid receptor and retinoid-X receptor gene homologs and elevation of retinoid-X receptor mRNA by retinoic acid. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol, 139:209-227.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Claeys, I., G. Simonet, J. Poels, T. Van Loy, L. Vercammen, A. De Loof, and J. Vanden Broeck. 2002. Insulin-related peptides and their conserved signal transduction pathway. Peptides, 23:807-816.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Darne, C., G. Veyssiere, and C. Jean. 1998. Phorbol ester causes ligand-independent activation of the androgen receptor. Eur. J. Biochem, 256:541-549.[ISI][Medline]

Dinan, L., P. Bourne, P. Whiting, T. S. Dhadialia, and T. H. Hutchinson. 2001. Screening of environmental contaminants for ecdysteroid agonist and antagonist activity using the Drosophila melanogaster BII cell in vitro assay. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 20:2038-2046.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Durica, D. S., and P. Hopkins. 1996. Expression of the genes encoding the ecdysteroid and retinoid receptors in regenerating tissues of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Gene, 171:237-241.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Eickhoff, C. V., S.-X. He, F. A. P. C. Gobas, and F. C. P. Law. 2003. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dungeness crabs (Cancer magister) near an aluminum smelter in Kitimat Arm, British Columbia, Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 22:50-58.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fingerman, S. W., and M. Fingerman. 1977. Effects of a polychlorinated biphenyl and a polychlorinated dibenzofuran on molting of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 18:138-142.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hatakeyama, M., D. M. Tessier, D. Y. Dunlap, E. Zou, and F. Matsumura. 2002. Estrogenic action of ß-HCH through activation of c-Neu in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol, 11:27-38.[CrossRef]

Hopkins, P. M. 1983. Patterns of serum ecdysteroids during induced and uninduced proecdysis in the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol, 52:350-356.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Ignar-Trowbridge, D. M., K. G. Nelson, M. C. Bidwell, S. W. Curtis, T. F. Washburn, J. A. McLachlan, and K. S. Korach. 1992. Coupling of dual signaling pathways: Epidermal growth factor action involves the estrogen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 89:4658-4662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kayal, S., and D. W. Connell. 1995. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biota from the brisbane river estuary, Australia. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci, 40:475-493.[CrossRef]

Kucklick, J. R., and J. E. Baker. 1998. Organochlorines in Lake Superior's food web. Environ. Sci. Technol, 32:1192-1198.[CrossRef]

Le Guevel, R., F. G. Petit, P. Le Goff, R. Metivier, Y. Valotaire, and F. Pakdel. 2000. Inhibition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) estrogen receptor activity by cadmium. Biol. Reprod, 63:259-266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mattig, F. R., U. Ballin, H. Bietz, K. Giessing, R. Kruse, and P. H. Becker. 1997. Organochlorines and heavy metals in benthic invertebrates and fish from the back barrier of Spiekeroog. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res, 45:113-133.

McLachlan, J. 2001. Environmental signaling: What embryos and evolution teach us about endocrine disrupting chemicals. Endocrine Rev, 22:319-341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Menone, M. L., A. Bortulos, F. Botto, J. E. Aizpun de Moreno, V. J. Moreno, O. Iribarne, T. L. Metcalfe, and C. D. Metcalfe. 2000. Organochlorine contaminants in a coastal lagoon in Argentina: Analysis of sediment, crabs, and cordgrass from two different habitats. Estuaries, 23:583-592.[CrossRef][ISI]

Mouneyrac, C., C. Amiard-Triquet, J. C. Amiard, and P. S. Rainbow. 2001. Comparison of metallothionein concentrations and tissue distribution of trace metals in crabs (Pachygrapsus marmoratus) from a metal-rich estuary, in and out of the reproductive season. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 129C:193-209.

Oberdörster, E., D. Rittschof, and D. A. LeBlanc. 1998. Alteration of [14C]-testosterone metabolism after chronic exposure of Daphnia magna to tributyltin. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 34:21-25.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Paez-Osuna, F., and L. Tron-Mayen. 1996. Concentration and distribution of heavy metals in tissues of wild and farmed shrimp Penaeus vannamei from the northwest coast of Mexico. Environ. Internl, 22:443-450.[CrossRef]

Perrimon, N., X. Lu, X. S. Hou, J.-C. Hsu, M. B. Melnick, T. B. Chou, and L. A. Perkins. 1995. Dissection of the torso signal transduction pathway in Drosophila. Mol. Reprod. Dev, 42:515-522.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Raabe, T. 2000. The Sevenless signaling pathway: Variations of a common theme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1496:151-163.[Medline]

Rodriguez Moreno, P. A., D. A. Medesani, and E. M. Rodriguez. 2003. Inhibition of molting by cadmium in the crab Chasmagnathus granulata (Decapoda Brachyura). Aquat. Toxicol, 64:155-164.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Schimmel, S. C., J. M. Patrick Jr., L. F. Faas, J. L. Oglesby, and A. J. Wilson Jr. 1979. Kepone: Toxicity and bioaccumulation in blue crabs. Estuaries, 2:9-15.

Shilo, B.-Z. 2003. Signaling by the Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor pathway during development. Exp. Cell Res, 284:140-149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Snyder, M. J. 1998. Identification of a new cytochrome P450 family, CYP45, from the lobster, Homarus americanus, and expression following hormone and xenobiotics treatments. Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 358:271-276.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Snyder, M. J., and E. P. Mulder. 2001. Environmental endocrine disruption in decapod crustacean larvae: Hormone titers, cytochrome P450, and stress protein responses to heptachlor exposure. Aquat. Toxicol, 55:177-190.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sohi, S., S. R. Palli, B. J. Cook, and A. Retnakaran. 1995. Forest insect cell lines responsive to 20-hydroxyecdysone and two nonsteroidal ecdysone agonists, RH-5849 and RH-5992. J. Insect Physiol, 41:457-464.[CrossRef]

Spindler, K.-D., M. Spindler-Barth, A. Turbert, and G. Adam. 1992. Actions of brassinosteroids on the epithelial cell line from Chironomus tentans. Z. Naturforsch, 47C:280-284.

Turoczy, N. J., B. D. Mitchell, A. H. Levings, and V. S. Rajendram. 2001. Cadmium, copper, mercury, and zinc concentrations in tissues of the King Crab (Pseudocarcinus gigas) from southeast Australian waters. Environ. Internl, 27:327-334.[CrossRef]

Weis, J. S., and L. H. Mantel. 1976. DDT as an accelerator of regeneration and molting in fiddler crabs. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci, 4:461-466.[CrossRef]

Wing, K. D. 1988. RH 5849, a nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist: Effects on a Drosophila cell line. Science, 241:467-469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1997a. Synthetic estrogenic agents do not interfere with sex differentiation but do inhibit molting of a cladoceran, Daphnia magna. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 58:596-602.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1997b. Effects of estrogenic agents on molting of the water flea, Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 38:281-285.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1998. Exposure to estrogenic xenobioticss disturbs the Y-organ-ecdysteroid receptor axis in the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Am. Zool, 38:207A, 725.

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1999a. Effects of estrogenic agents on chitobiase activities of the epidermis and hepatopancreas of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 42:185-190.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1999b. Effects of exposure to diethyl phthalate, 4-tert-octylphenol, and 2,4,5-trichlorobiphenyl on activity of chitobiase in the epidermis and hepatopancreas of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 122C:115-120.

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1999c. Chitobiase activities in the epidermis and hepatopancreas of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator, during the molting cycle. Mar. Biol, 133:97-101.[CrossRef]

Zou, E., and M. Fingerman. 1999d. Patterns of N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase isoenzymes in the epidermis and hepatopancreas and induction of N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase activity by 20-hydroxyecdysone in the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 124C:345-349.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?