The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Modulation of Synaptic Function in Retinal Amacrine Cells1
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
| SYNOPSIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amacrine cells are interneurons that have diverse functions in retinal signal processing. In order to study signaling and modulation in retinal amacrine cells, we employ a simplified culture system containing identifiable GABAergic amacrine cells. Immunocytochemistry experiments indicate that GABAergic amacrine cells express metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5), a group I mGluR usually linked to the IP3 signaling pathway. Ca2+ imaging experiments using an mGluR5-specific agonist indicate that these receptors are functional and when activated, can stimulate temporally diverse Ca2+ elevations. To begin to establish the role of these receptors in modulating amacrine cell function, we have used electrophysiological methods to ask whether ion channels are the targets of mGluR5-dependent modulation. Here we discuss our results indicating that activation of mGluR5 leads to enhancement of currents through GABAA receptors. This enhancement is dependent upon elevations in cytosolic Ca2+ and activation of protein kinase C (PKC). To explore the consequences of Ca2+ elevations in another context, we have used nitric oxide (NO) donors to mimic the effects of activating the Ca2+-dependent synthetic enzyme for NO, neuronal nitric oxide synthase. We find that exposure to NO donors also enhances the amplitude of currents through GABAA receptors. Together, these results indicate that glutamate from presynaptic bipolar cells has the potential to work through multiple mechanisms to regulate the function of amacrine-to-amacrine cell GABAergic synapses.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Information processing in the visual system begins with the arrival of photons and the initiation of a retinal signal that is ultimately exported to other visual centers in the brain. Between the input side of the retina, the photoreceptors, and the output side of the retina, the ganglion cells, there are multiple classes of interneurons. The activities of these interneurons shape the retinal signal in diverse, and in many cases, unidentified ways. Amacrine cells form a multifunctional group of retinal interneurons that make synapses in the second synaptic layer of the retina, the inner plexiform layer (IPL). In the IPL, amacrine cells receive excitatory glutamatergic input from bipolar cells and primarily inhibitory input from other amacrine cells. Amacrine cells make synapses back onto bipolar cells, onto other amacrine cells and onto ganglion cells. Although our understanding of the function of amacrine cell synaptic circuitry is incomplete, it is clear that the synaptic interactions in which these cells participate are complex (Dowling and Boycott, 1965
An additional layer of complexity is likely to be engendered by the wealth of modulatory substances found in the retina, especially in the inner retina. These substances include peptides (Morgan, 1983
; Vaney et al., 1989
) and nitric oxide (Blute et al., 1997
; Neal et al., 1998
; Fischer and Stell, 1999
; Ríos et al., 2000
; Crousillac et al., 2003
) as well as classical neurotransmitters (Vaney et al., 1989
). Although the evidence for the existence of modulatory substances is compelling, we know very little about their function. In order to begin to understand how the signaling properties of amacrine cells are modulated, we employ a simplified system containing identified amacrine cells derived from the embryonic chicken retina (Gleason et al., 1992
). The amacrine cells in culture acquire the ion channels expressed by amacrine cells in the adult chicken retina (Huba and Hofmann, 1991
; Huba et al., 1992
) and form functional GABAergic synapses with one another. Importantly, the amacrine-to-amacrine GABAergic cell synapses are very common in vertebrate retinae and have been estimated to constitute about one-third of amacrine cell synapses in the goldfish retina (Marc and Liu, 2000
). These synapses have also been demonstrated physiologically in the intact retina (Watanabe et al., 2000
; Frech et al., 2001
).
Because it is well-established that amacrine cells receive glutamatergic input from bipolar cells, we tested the hypothesis that glutamate can act as a modulator of amacrine cell function. Amacrine cells are known to express both ionotropic (Qin and Pourcho, 1999a
, b
, 2001
; Fletcher et al., 2000
; Vandenbranden et al., 2000
; Carvalho et al., 2002
; Firth et al., 2003
; Veruki et al., 2003
) and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs, see below). We explored two facets of glutamate action. First we asked whether mGluRs might mediate modulatory effects of glutamate. Second we addressed the possibility that Ca2+ elevations engendered by activation of the full complement of expressed glutamate receptors can alter the function of GABAergic amacrine cells.
| THE EXPRESSION OF MGLUR5 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabotropic glutamate receptors are a family (mGluRs18) of G protein-coupled receptors. In the mammalian retina, there is immunocytochemical (Koulen et al., 1997
|
| MGLUR5 IS LINKED TO THE IP3 PATHWAY IN GABAERGIC AMACRINE CELLS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 is usually coupled to activation of the IP3 signaling pathway and release of Ca2+ from internal stores. To examine the signaling properties of mGluR5 expressed in amacrine cells, we performed Ca2+ imaging experiments. For these experiments, cultured cells were loaded with fluo-3 and fluorescence intensity was monitored over time. Activating mGluR5 with the specific agonist, (RS)-2-chloro-5-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG), produced cytosolic Ca2+ elevations that were temporally diverse. The temporal features of the mGluR5-dependent Ca2+ elevations fell into four classes. For a group of forty-two amacrine cells initially tested, 17% of amacrine cells tested produced a Ca2+ elevation that had an initial transient spike, followed by a prolonged shoulder (Fig. 2A). Twenty nine percent of cells responded with a transient spike only (Fig. 2B). A smaller group of amacrine cells had an initial transient spike followed by Ca2+ oscillations (9%, Fig. 2C) and 45% of the cells gave prolonged responses that declined slowly and could outlast the 30 minute recording period (Fig. 2D). Some insight into the source of this variability was revealed by experiments performed in nominally Ca2+-free external solution. Under these conditions, responses from all of the cells tested (n = 59) fell into the second group in that they exhibited transient Ca2+ elevations with no subsequent shoulder or prolonged phase (Fig. 2E). The initial transient Ca2+ elevations could be inhibited when cells in Ca2+ free solutions were exposed to a phospholipase C inhibiter, U73122 [GenBank] (Fig. 2F). These observations led us to conclude that the initial phase of the mGluR5-dependent Ca2+ elevation is due to IP3-mediated Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, while the second and most temporally variable phase can be attributed to entry of Ca2+ across the plasma membrane. Results from both physiological and immunocytochemical experiments indicate that a TRPC channel is a good candidate for this influx pathway (Sosa et al., 2002
|
| GABAA RECEPTORS ARE TARGETS OF MGLUR5-DEPENDENT MODULATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Once we characterized the expression of mGluR5 and established its linkage to a signaling pathway, our focus turned to identifying targets of modulation. Analysis of the synapses formed between these GABAergic amacrine cells in culture has established that postsynaptic receptors are GABAA receptors (Gleason et al., 1993
10% enhancement of the GABA-gated current amplitude. No changes occurred in the Cl equilibrium potential indicating that the enhancement was not due to a change in the Cl distribution. Buffering cytosolic Ca2+ with BAPTA blocked the current enhancement indicating that the modulation was Ca2+-dependent (Hoffpauir and Gleason, 2002a
|
Because signaling via the IP3 pathway usually leads to activation of PKC, we tested the hypothesis that the mGluR5-dependent modulation of GABAA was also PKC-dependent. We found that direct activation of PKC also produced enhancement of the GABA-gated current making this enzyme a good candidate for participation in the pathway that modulates the GABAA receptor (Hoffpauir and Gleason, 2002a
One of the major objectives of our work is to understand how the function of amacrine cell synapses is modulated. As such, we wanted to determine whether synaptic GABAA receptors, specifically, were targets of mGluR5-dependent signaling. To address this, we recorded synaptic currents from individual amacrine cells receiving autaptic inputs. To activate synaptic transmission, individual amacrine cells were voltage clamped in the whole cell configuration and held just inside the activation range of the voltage-gated Ca2+ currents expressed by these cells (Gleason et al., 1994
). With this low level of presynaptic stimulation, quantal currents could be resolved (Fig. 4A). A comparison of the amplitude distributions indicated that the mean peak amplitude of the GABA induced quantal currents was enhanced by about 18% (Fig. 4 B and C). This result indicates that GABAA receptors at synapses are modulated by activation of mGluR5. Furthermore, it is intriguing that the level of enhancement observed at synapses is nearly twice that found for whole cell currents. This observation raises the possibility that the signaling machinery is somehow targeted to synaptic GABAA receptors.
|
| THE ROLE OF NITRIC OXIDE AS A MODULATOR IN THE INNER RETINA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glutamate has the broad potential to regulate amacrine cell function by virtue of its ability to engender Ca2+ elevations. These elevations can stem from activation of mGluR5 and the IP3 pathway as well as by activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors. One Ca2+-sensitive enzyme that could be activated in this way is neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). Neuronal NOS is a Ca2+/calmodulin-sensitive enzyme that, when activated, converts arginine to citrulline and nitric oxide (NO). NO can then diffuse out of the source cell but its spread is limited because NO has a very brief
life (36 sec). The canonical signaling pathway involves NO-dependent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase, generation of cGMP and stimulation of protein kinase activity.
Expression of nNOS by amacrine cells in the chicken retina was demonstrated by Fisher and Stell (1999)
and we have established that cultured GABAergic amacrine cells express this enzyme (Hoffpauir and Gleason, 2002b
). The generation of NO and of NO-dependent signaling has been examined in the intact turtle retina (Blute et al., 1998
, 1999
, 2000
; Cao and Eldred, 2001
). DAF-2 imaging experiments revealed that activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors generates NO signals (Blute et al., 2000
) and stimulates the production of cGMP in amacrine cells. Given these interesting findings, we asked whether the GABAA receptor might be a target of NO-dependent signaling in GABAergic amacrine cells.
In these experiments, we bypassed activation of nNOS by exposing the cells to nitric oxide donors. We found that 1-Hydroxy-2-oxo-3-(N-ethyl-2-aminoethyl)-3-ethyl-1-triazene (NOC 12) enhanced the GABA-gated current in all cells examined (Fig. 5, n = 8). This same effect was achieved with other NO donors (2'-[Hydroxynitrosohydrazino]bisethanamine [NOC-18, 300 µM], S-Nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine [SNAP, 250µM]). In these experiments, we observed no shift in the chloride distribution indicating that the effect was on the GABAA receptors themselves. Preliminary experiments using an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclases indicate that NO is not working via the classical pathway (B.K.H., unpublished data). Interestingly, it has been demonstrated in cultured amacrine cells from the rat that NO inhibits GABA-gated currents in a partially guanylate cyclase-dependent manner (Wexler et al., 1998
). Thus, the effects of NO may be species specific and may be influenced by the subunit expression pattern of the GABAA receptors.
|
| THE EXPANDED ROLE OF GLUTAMATE IN THE INNER RETINA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings indicate that activation of glutamate receptors can lead to enhancement of currents mediated by GABAA receptors. Activation of mGluR5 leads to a Ca2+- and PKC-dependent enhancement of the current that appears to be amplified for GABAA receptors localized to the synapse. We also demonstrate that nitric oxide can act on GABAA receptors to enhance their function. Together, the results of these studies suggest that in the retina, glutamate released from bipolar cells not only depolarizes postsynaptic amacrine cells, but activates signaling pathways that can regulate their function (Fig. 6).
|
Interestingly, our results indicate that signaling through different pathways can have convergent effects on amacrine cell function. It is not surprising that GABAA receptors are subject to multiple modes of regulation because GABAergic synapses are so prevalent in the IPL. In an immunocytochemical study of the IPL of the goldfish, Marc and Liu (2000)
An important perspective involves the growing evidence that much of amacrine cell signaling occurs locally. Although amacrine cells can make action potentials (Murakami and Shimoda, 1977
; Barnes and Werblin, 1986
; Eliasof et al., 1987
), action potentials are not required for synaptic transmission. Instead, graded depolarizations are sufficient to stimulate ne urotransmitter release (Gleason et al., 1993
; Bieda and Copenhagen, 1999
). Furthermore, spatially discreet Ca2+ signals have been observed in amacrine cell processes both in culture (Hurtado et al., 2002
) and in the intact retina (Denk and Detwiler, 1999
) suggesting that presynaptic activity can be highly localized. Thus, the effects of glutamate released from a bipolar cell terminal are probably restricted to nearby amacrine cell processes.
To fully appreciate the consequences of enhancing amacrine-to-amacrine GABAergic synapses, we have to consider the function of these synapses in retinal signal processing. Unfortunately, even though these synapses are very common, we know little about their function. The best-studied amacrine cell synapses are those made onto ganglion cells and the feedback synapses made onto bipolar cells (Masland, 1996
). Thus, a divide exists between what we are learning about the modulation of GABAergic amacrine cell synapses and the function of these synapses in the retina. What we learn in culture, however, will help us to direct questions that can be addressed in the near future with studies of amacrine cell signaling in the intact retina.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant to E. Gleason (EY12204) and a Sigma Xi Grant in Aid of Research to B. K. Hoffpauir.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 From the Symposium Recent Developments in Neurobiology presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59 January 2004, at New Orleans, Louisiana.
2 Present address: Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia USA 26506 ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Barnes, S., and F. Werblin. 1986. Gated currents generate single spike activity in amacrine cells of the tiger salamander retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 83:1509-12.
Bieda, M. C., and D. R. Copenhagen. 1999. Sodium action potentials are not required for light-evoked release of GABA or glycine from retinal amacrine cells. J. Neurophysiol, 81:3092-5.
Blute, T. A., J. De Grenier, and W. D. Eldred. 1999. Stimulation with N-methyl-D-aspartate or kainic acid increases cyclic guanosine monophosphate-like immunoreactivity in turtle retina: Involvement of nitric oxide synthase. J. Comp. Neurol, 404:75-85.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Blute, T. A., M. R. Lee, and W. D. Eldred. 2000. Direct imaging of NMDA-stimulated nitric oxide production in the retina. Vis. Neurosci, 17:557-66.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Blute, T. A., B. Mayer, and W. D. Eldred. 1997. Immunocytochemical and histochemical localization of nitric oxide synthase in the turtle retina. Vis. Neurosci, 14:717-29.[Web of Science][Medline]
Blute, T. A., P. Velasco, and W. D. Eldred. 1998. Functional localization of soluble guanylate cyclase in turtle retina: Modulation of cGMP by nitric oxide donors. Vis. Neurosci, 15:485-98.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cai, W., and R. G. Pourcho. 1999. Localization of metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR1alpha and mGluR2/3 in the cat retina. J. Comp. Neurol, 407:427-37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cao, L., and W. D. Eldred. 2001. Subcellular localization of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in turtle retina: Electron immunocytochemistry. Vis. Neurosci, 18:949-60.[Web of Science][Medline]
Carvalho, A. L., S. Correia, C. J. Faro, C. B. Duarte, A. P. Carvalho, and E. M. Pires. 2002. Phosphorylation of GluR4 AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunit by protein kinase C in cultured retina amacrine neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci, 15:465-74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Crousillac, S., M. LeRouge, M. Rankin, and E. Gleason. 2003. Immunolocalization of TRPC channel subunits 1 and 4 in the chicken retina. Vis. Neurosci, 20:453-63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Denk, W., and P. B. Detwiler. 1999. Optical recording of light-evoked calcium signals in the functionally intact retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 96:7035-40.
Dowling, J. E., and B. B. Boycott. 1965. Neural connections of the retina: Fine structure of the inner plexiform layer. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol, 30:393-402.
Dubin, M. W. 1970. The inner plexiform layer of the vertebrate retina: A quantitative and comparative electron microscopic analysis. J. Comp. Neurol, 140:479-505.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Eliasof, S., S. Barnes, and F. Werblin. 1987. The interaction of ionic currents mediating single spike activity in retinal amacrine cells of the tiger salamander. J. Neurosci, 7:3512-24.[Abstract]
Firth, S. I., W. Li, S. C. Massey, and D. W. Marshak. 2003. AMPA receptors mediate acetylcholine release from starburst amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. J. Comp. Neurol, 466:80-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fischer, A. J., and W. K. Stell. 1999. Nitric oxide synthase-containing cells in the retina, pigmented epithelium, choroid, and sclera of the chick eye. J. Comp. Neurol, 405:1-14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fletcher, E. L., I. Hack, J. H. Brandstatter, and H. Wassle. 2000. Synaptic localization of NMDA receptor subunits in the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol, 420:98-112.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Frech, M. J., J. Perez-Leon, H. Wassle, and K. H. Backus. 2001. Characterization of the spontaneous synaptic activity of amacrine cells in the mouse retina. J. Neurophysiol, 86:1632-43.
Gleason, E., S. Borges, and M. Wilson. 1993. Synaptic transmission between pairs of retinal amacrine cells in culture. J. Neurosci, 13:2359-70.[Abstract]
Gleason, E., S. Borges, and M. Wilson. 1994. Control of transmitter release from retinal amacrine cells by Ca2+ influx and efflux. Neuron, 13:1109-17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gleason, E., P. Mobbs, R. Nuccitelli, and M. Wilson. 1992. Development of functional calcium channels in cultured avian photoreceptors. Vis. Neurosci, 8:315-27.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hartveit, E., J. H. Brandstatter, R. Enz, and H. Wässle. 1995. Expression of the mRNA of seve n metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 to 7) in the rat retina. An in situ hybridization study on tissue sections and isolated cells. Eur. J. Neurosci, 7:1472-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hoffpauir, B. K., and E. L. Gleason. 2002a. Activation of mGluR5 modulates GABA(A) receptor function in retinal amacrine cells. J. Neurophysiol, 88:1766-76.
Hoffpauir, B. K., and E. L. Gleason. 2002b. Synaptic transmission between GABAergic amacrine cells is modulated by nitric oxide. Program No. 158.15.
Huba, R., and H. D. Hofmann. 1991. Transmitter-gated currents of GABAergic amacrine-like cells in chick retinal cultures. Vis. Neurosci, 6:303-14.[Web of Science][Medline]
Huba, R., H. Schneider, and H. D. Hofmann. 1992. Voltage-gated currents of putative GABAergic amacrine cells in primary cultures and in retinal slice preparations. Brain Res, 577:10-8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hurtado, J., S. Borges, and M. Wilson. 2002. Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchanger controls the gain of the Ca(2+) amplifier in the dendrites of amacrine cells. J. Neurophysiol, 88:2765-77.
Koulen, P., R. Kuhn, H. Wässle, and J. H. Brandstatter. 1997. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR1alpha and mGluR5a: Localization in both synaptic layers of the rat retina. J. Neurosci, 17:2200-11.
Marc, R. E., and W. Liu. 2000. Fundamental GABAergic amacrine cell circuitries in the retina: Nested feedback, concatenated inhibition, and axosomatic synapses. J. Comp. Neurol, 425:560-82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Masland, R. H. 1996. Processing and encoding of visual information in the retina. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol, 6:467-74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Morgan, I. G. 1983. The organization of amacrine cell types which use different transmitters in chicken retina. Prog. Brain Res, 58:191-9.[Web of Science][Medline]
Murakami, M., and Y. Shimoda. 1977. Identification of amacrine and ganglion cells in the carp retina. J. Physiol, 264:801-18.
Neal, M., J. Cunningham, and K. Matthews. 1998. Selective release of nitric oxide from retinal amacrine and bipolar cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci, 39:850-3.
Qin, P., and R. G. Pourcho. 1999a. AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subunits GluR2 and GluR4 in the cat retina: An immunocytochemical study. Vis. Neurosci, 16:1105-14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Qin, P., and R. G. Pourcho. 1999b. Localization of AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subunits in the cat retina: A light- and electron-microscopic study. Vis. Neurosci, 16:169-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Qin, P., and R. G. Pourcho. 2001. Immunocytochemical localization of kainate-selective glutamate receptor subunits GluR5, GluR6, and GluR7 in the cat retina. Brain Res, 890:211-21.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ríos, H., J. J. López-Costa, N. S. Fosser, A. Brusco, and J. P. Saavedra. 2000. Development of nitric oxide neurons in the chick embryo retina. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res, 120:17-25.[Medline]
Sosa, R., B. Hoffpauir, M. L. Rankin, R. C. Bruch, and E. L. Gleason. 2002. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 and calcium signaling in retinal amacrine cells. J. Neurochem, 81:973-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vandenbranden, C. A., W. Kamphuis, B. Nunes Cardozo, and M. Kamermans. 2000. Expression and localization of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits in the goldfish retinaan in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical study. J. Neurocytol, 29:729-42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vaney, D. I., G. E. Whitington, and H. M. Young. 1989. The morphology and topographic distribution of substance-P-like immunoreactive amacrine cells in the cat retina. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci, 237:471-88.[Medline]
Veruki, M. L., S. H. Morkve, and E. Hartveit. 2003. Functional properties of spontaneous EPSCs and non-NMDA receptors in rod amacrine (AII) cells in the rat retina. J. Physiol, 549:759-74.
Watanabe, S., A. Koizumi, S. Matsunaga, J. W. Stocker, and A. Kaneko. 2000. GABA-Mediated inhibition between amacrine cells in the goldfish retina. J. Neurophysiol, 84:1826-34.
Wexler, E. M., P. K. Stanton, and S. Nawy. 1998. Nitric oxide depresses GABAA receptor function via coactivation of cGMP- dependent kinase and phosphodiesterase. J. Neurosci, 18:2342-9.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





