Skip Navigation


Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on August 2, 2008
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2008 48(4):527-534; doi:10.1093/icb/icn080
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/4/527    most recent
icn080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohno, S.
Right arrow Articles by Guillette, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Novel approaches for the study of vertebrate steroid hormone receptors

Satomi Kohno*,1, Yoshinao Katsu{dagger}, Taisen Iguchi{dagger} and Louis J. Guillette, Jr*
* Department of Zoology, 223 Bartram Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; {dagger}Okazaki Institute for Integrative Bioscience, National Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes of Natural Sciences and Department of Basic Biology, School of Life Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8787, Japan

Correspondence: 1E-mail: kohno{at}zoology.ufl.edu


    Synopsis
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Steroid hormones are essential for the normal function of most organ systems in vertebrates. Reproductive activities in females and males, such as the differentiation, growth and maintenance of the reproductive system, require signaling by sex steroid hormones. Although extensively studied in mammals and a few fish and bird species, the evolution and molecular mechanisms associated with the nuclear steroid hormone receptors are still poorly understood in amphibians and reptiles. Given our interest in environmental signaling of sex determination as well as a major interest in environmental contaminants that can mimic steroid hormone signaling, we have established an approach to study the molecular function (ligand binding and trans-activation) of steroid hormone receptors cloned from reptiles. This approach involves molecular cloning and sequencing of steroid hormone receptors, phylogenic analysis and in vitro trans-activation assays using endogenous or exogenous ligands. Comparing the in vitro trans-activation induced by different ligands with receptors cloned from different species would develop additional functional relationships (classification) among steroid hormone receptors. This approach can provide insight into understanding why each species could have different responses to exogenous ligands. Further, we have developed a novel and less invasive approach to obtaining mRNA for molecular cloning and sequencing of steroid hormone receptors in reptiles and other non-mammalian species, using blood cells as a source of genetic material. For example, white blood cells (WBCs) and red blood cells (RBCs) of the American alligator both express steroid hormone receptors and have adequate amounts of mRNA for molecular cloning. This approach would allow us to analyze components of endocrine function of steroid hormones without sacrificing animals. Especially in endangered species, this approach could provide an understanding of endocrine functions, elucidate the phylogenic relationships of various receptors in vitro, such as the steroid hormone receptors, and determine possible effects of environmental contaminants in a minimally invasive manner.


    Introduction
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Steroid hormones are essential for the normal function of most organ systems in vertebrates. Estrogens regulate ovarian development and differentiation, induce maturation of the female reproductive tract, and stimulate hepatic vitellogenesis in reptiles. Androgens are involved in testicular development and differentiation, control of spermatogenesis, maturation of the male reproductive tract and differentiation of external genitalia (Norris 1980Go; Bentley 1998Go).

The differentiation, growth, and maintenance of the reproductive system require endocrine signaling by sex steroid hormones via their receptors. Two different types of receptors for steroid hormones have been described: those that belong to the super family of nuclear receptors (Blumberg and Evans 1998Go; Bertrand et al. 2004Go) and those that function as membrane-linked (extra-nuclear) receptors (Hammes and Levin 2007Go). Two subtypes of receptor proteins have been described to represent the extra-nuclear version: G-coupled steroid hormone receptors (Filardo et al. 2000Go; Zhu et al. 2003Go; Revankar et al. 2005Go; Thomas et al. 2006Go) and membrane-localized classical steroid hormone receptors (Razandi et al. 2003Go; Pedram et al. 2007Go). Nuclear receptors work as transcription factors regulating mRNA expression, and have six functionally distinct domains (Krust et al. 1986Go). These domains are labeled the A through F domains with the C and E domains playing essential roles of DNA binding and ligand binding, respectively (Fig. 1). The C domain of a steroid receptor is the DNA-binding domain, which uses a zinc finger motif to accomplish binding to target DNA. The E domain is the ligand-binding domain, which is involved in binding to steroid hormone and recruiting various transcriptional cofactors to the steroid receptor so that transcription can occur (Pratt and Toft 1997Go). Extra-nuclear receptors for steroid hormones have been demonstrated and various receptor types have been cloned. The rapid reactions to steroid hormones characterizing these membrane receptors, as well as membrane-localized classical steroid hormone receptors, appear to be induced by G-protein coupling, which causes post-translational modifications or phosphorylation (Razandi et al. 2003Go; Hammes and Levin 2007Go; Watson et al. 2007Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Comparison of amino-acid sequence for each domain of vertebrates (A) estrogen receptor {alpha} (ESR1) and (B) androgen receptor (AR). The DNA-binding (DBD) and ligand-binding (LBD) domains of both ESR1 and AR are well conserved among vertebrate species. Numbers indicate present sequence identity compared to the human sequence. Bar indicates 100 amino acids.

 
Although, extensively studied in mammals and in a few fish and bird species, the evolution and molecular mechanisms associated with the nuclear steroid hormone receptors have been poorly understood, especially in amphibians and reptiles (Young et al. 1995Go). For example, it is well accepted that the estrogenic sex steroid hormones play an important role in sex determination in many non-mammalian and non-avian vertebrates (Crews 2003Go; Yao and Capel 2005Go). In mammals and birds, sex determination is dependent on the genotype, XX:XY or ZW:ZZ, at fertilization. However, in some lizards, and turtles and all crocodilians studied to date, sex determination is dependent on incubation temperature during a narrow time period of embryonic development (Crews 2003Go). Generally, lower temperatures produce males whereas higher temperatures produce females in turtles. In contrast, lower and very high temperatures produce females and intermediate temperatures produce males in crocodilians (Crews 2003Go). Sex determination by environmental signals has been investigated, and the important role of sex steroid hormones on sex reversal in reptilian sex determination has been established (Crews 2003Go).

Given this sensitivity of sex determination to steroid hormone signaling, contamination of the global environment with chemicals that can mimic steroid hormones should be a major concern. It has been well established that some environmental contaminants can act as agonist or antagonist ligands on various steroid hormone receptors or they can alter the synthesis/degradation of endogenous hormones (Tyler et al. 1998Go; Guillette and Gunderson 2001Go; Milnes et al. 2006Go). Several studies suggest that various contaminants can directly act on steroid hormone receptors as an agonist or antagonist (Rooney and Guillette 2000Go; Gray et al. 2002Go). Indeed, endocrine alterations which result from developmental exposure to endocrine disruptive contaminants has been observed in a number of wildlife species, including turtles (Willingham et al. 2000Go) and the American alligator (Guillette et al. 2000Go; Guillette et al. 2007Go). Exposure to various contaminants with estrogenic potential during development alters sex determination and gonadal steroidogenesis in freshwater turtles (Willingham and Crews 1999Go; Willingham et al. 2000Go) and the American alligator (Crain et al. 1997Go). Further, recent studies have documented altered expression of estrogen receptor β (ESR2) mRNA in gonadal tissue from juvenile American alligators caught in Lake Apopka (FL, USA) (Kohno et al. 2008Go). This lake is polluted with various endocrine disruptive contaminants, some of which have been shown to be estrogenic (Vonier et al. 1996Go; Guillette et al. 2002Go). Male gonadal tissue from animals obtained at Lake Apopka exhibited elevated expression of ESR2 mRNA when compared to animals of similar age and size from a reference population (Kohno et al. 2008Go). The altered expression and functioning of ESR2 might be important in explaining the gonadal alterations induced by contaminants in the American alligator as previous studies have suggested that this receptor type is reactive with a wide array of exogeneous estrogenic chemicals (Kuiper et al. 1996Go). Therefore, functional details of steroid hormone receptors in wildlife, especially in reptiles, need to be investigated. Here, we summarize several novel approaches to studying the molecular function (ligand binding and trans-activation) of steroid hormone receptors cloned from reptiles and fishes.


    Two different trans-activation assays for examining steroid receptors in vitro
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Reporter gene assays using luciferase in mammalian cell lines are commonly used to characterize trans-activation by steroid hormone receptors. Generally, the cells are transfected with plasmids including cDNA for a steroid hormone receptor. The reporter plasmids, which have a specific sequence of a hormone response element (HRE) and luciferase reporter cDNA, are also transfected into the cells (Fig. 2). Following ligand (steroid hormone or test chemical) binding to the receptor, the receptor–ligand complex interacts with the HRE, inducing the transcription of luciferase cDNA. As a result, the reporter protein, luciferase, accumulates in the cells and the luminescence signal increases in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2). However, these results would be somewhat limited as they indicate potential trans-activation using only a canonical HRE. Generally, investigators use a common sequence of HRE for analysis of steroid hormone receptors cloned from any vertebrate, although it's rare to find canonical HREs in the promoter region (O'Lone et al. 2004Go). The canonical HREs do not produce problems in the trans-activation assay; however, each steroid hormone receptor from different species could have differing responses to the canonical HRE given the variation in amino-acid sequence and folding of each unique receptor. Therefore, we have added to this approach a new assay, the modified GAL4 system that does not require DNA recognition of an HRE. To eliminate this dependence on the canonical sequence of the HRE, we have developed a novel reporter–gene assay using a modified GAL4 system (Promega, Madison, WI) that is traditionally used in the two-hybrid system for mammalian cells (Katsu et al. 2006aGo). The cells are transfected with the expression construct for a steroid hormone receptor-GAL4 fusion protein. Following ligand binding to the receptor, and if it can induce trans-activation, the receptor-GAL4 fusion protein interacts with the GAL4 binding site and activates transcription. As a result, luciferase accumulates in the cell and a luciferase signal increases with the dose of the ligand (Fig. 2). The modified GAL4 system, using red-belly turtle (Pseudemys nelsoni) ESR1, for example, exhibits a 10-fold higher induction with estradiol-17β when compared to the HRE-Luciferase System; however, the sensitivity between the two assay systems, measured as an EC50 for example, is not different (Katsu et al. 2008Go). The two assay systems use different mammalian cell lines, as HEK 293 or Hep G2 were used for the trans-activation assay with HRE of ESR1 or AR, whereas CHO-K1 cells were used for the GAL4 trans-activation assay. This difference in the fold induction of luciferase induced by the various tested ligands could be caused by different regulatory sequences of the luciferase reporter cDNA (HRE versus GAL4) or by differing cell lines (HEK293 or Hep G2 cells for HRE; CHO-K1 for GAL4). Moreover, this new system, as described above, is completely free of HRE sequence issues. However, one potential issue with this system relates to the effect of fusing the steroid hormone receptor and GAL4 protein on trans-activation. Although both systems need to recruit cofactors for trans-activation, recruiting the cofactors could be a potential problem with the steroid hormone receptor-GAL4 fusion protein. The transfected plasmids of the luciferase reporter cDNA have only a limited regulatory region such as the HRE or the GAL4 binding site to express luciferase and don't have AP1 or Sp1 sites. Therefore, it is possible to miss potential inductions of trans-activation via action of membrane-localized, classical, steroid-hormone receptors, or other transcription factors working with steroid–hormone receptors, such as Sp1 or AP1.


Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Two different systems utilized for trans-activation assays with luciferase for analysis of steroid hormone receptors: a typical luciferase assay using the HRE (left); a novel luciferase assay using the modified GAL4 system.

 

    Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER {alpha}; ESR1)
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Phylogenic analysis of ESR1 amino-acid sequences clearly has shown that crocodilian estrogen receptors are a sister group of Aves and form an archosaurian clad (Katsu et al. 2004Go; Katsu et al. 2006bGo). Red-belly turtle (P. nelsoni) is in an immediate out-group of Archosauria with the most distinct group of squamates (lizards and snakes) when birds and reptiles are compared (Katsu et al. 2008Go). Ten ESR1 sequences have been cloned from Sauropsida (birds and reptiles); however, to date, only four ESR1 sequences have been characterized by trans-activation. The DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains of ESR1 are well conserved among vertebrate species compared with amino-acid sequences (Fig. 1A). Specifically, the DNA-binding domain is highly conserved with 94–100% identity among vertebrates. This conservation of sequence suggests that ESR1 could regulate similar target genes among vertebrate species. However, this needs to be tested and further clarification is possible, once trans-activation data are available, from assays of ESR1 action as described above. Similarly, the ligand-binding domain is well conserved, but it does not show the same very high degree of sequence similarity as seen in the DNA-binding domain (Fig. 1A). This indicates that ESR1 could potentially bind to a wide range of ligands with species specificity.

Trans-activation assays using red-belly turtle (P. nelsoni) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) ESR1 revealed that estradiol-17β (E2), ethynylestradiol (EE2), and diethylstilbestrol (DES) have higher potentials than estrone (E1) or estriol (E3), whereas DES showed higher potentials than E2 in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis affinis) (Fig. 3). As a unique way of examining steroid hormone receptor activity, we performed a cluster analysis using each EC50 in the trans-activation assay of ESR1 (Fig. 5A). This analysis showed that mosquitofish ESR1 has more similar characteristics to red-belly turtle ESR1 than to roach ESR1, as ligands were classified into two groups by their characteristics of trans-activation; that is, group of E2, EE2, and DES and group of E1 and E2 (Fig. 5A). This initial analysis is small as it used just three species and five ligands, but is promising in that it could provide important predictive information about species risk to various environmental contaminants.


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 The trans-activation assay on (A) red-belly turtle, (B) mosquitofish, and (C) roach estrogen receptor {alpha} (ESR1). Red-belly and roach ESR1 revealed that E2, EE2, and DES have higher potentials than does E1 or E3, whereas DES showed higher potentials than did E2 in mosquitofish ESR1. Charts were modified from publications by Katsu et al. (2007aGo, 2007bGo, 2008Go).

 

    Androgen receptor (AR)
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A recent phylogenic analysis of AR amino-acid sequences in reptiles and birds has been presented (Katsu et al. 2008Go). Phylogenic relationships for the ARs, based on molecular sequences, were similar to those observed for ESR1. There are only six sequences of full-length AR cloned from Sauropsida in the database, and only three receptors have been characterized by trans-activation. The DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains of AR are well conserved among vertebrates (Fig. 1B). Trans-activation of the red-belly turtle AR with a variety of endogenous (DHT, 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone; T, testosterone; 11-KT, 11-ketotestosterone) and pharmaceutical androgens (MT, 17{alpha}-methyltestosterone; Tren, trenbolone) revealed the following order in trans-activation potential: DHT = MT = Tren > T (Figs. 4 and 5B). Mosquitofish (G. affinis affinis), like other teleost fish studied to date, have two ARs: type-1 and type-2 (Katsu et al. 2007aGo). Trans-activation on both types of mosquitofish AR revealed a similar pattern; that is, MT had the highest potential, whereas Tren = 11-KT > DHT = T (Figs. 4 and 5GoB). However, cluster analysis of ARs using their EC50 for different ligands revealed a different relationship than expressed by the phylogeny based on amino-acid sequences (Fig. 5B). On the other hand, DHT and T showed different characteristic from MT, Tren and 11-KT on trans-activation of AR in the cluster analysis of ligands (Fig. 5B).


Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 The trans-activation assay on (A) red-belly turtle, (B) mosquitofish type-1, and (C) type-2 androgen receptor (AR). Charts were modified from publications by Katsu et al. (2007aGo, 2007bGo, 2008Go).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Cluster analysis of EC50 on trans-activation assay of (A) estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) and (B) AR. Cluster was calculated by Agglomerative Nesting (v1.0.2) in Free Statistics Software (v1.1.22-r6) using the Ward method (Wessa 2008Go). On both analyses, red-belly turtle ESR1 or ANDR revealed similarities to roach or mosquitofish type-1 more than to other teleosts, respectively. These relationships were different from a strict phylogeny based on amino-acid sequences. Table of EC50 was modified from the tables in the publications by Katsu et al. (2007aGo, 2007bGo, 2008Go). E2, estradiol-17β; DES, diethylstilbestrol; EE2, ethinyleestradiol.

 
Although more data, both from additional species and ligands, are needed to obtain better estimates of classifications, these results indicate that the functional characteristics of recombinant protein could be a great source of data to estimate novel physiological responses that depend on the functions of cloned proteins. Considering both sequence-based and functional-characteristics-based clustering or classification could provide help in understanding not only endogenous endocrine systems, but also be used to develop risk assessments for vertebrate species exposed to a wide array of endocrine-altering environmental contaminants.


    A novel approach for cDNA cloning and analysis of steroid receptors
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Most non-mammalian species, including alligators, have RBCs with a functional nucleus and organelles similar to other cells (Kregenow 1977Go); thus, RBCs likely regulate mRNA expression as do other type of cells. Therefore, both WBCs and RBCs are likely to respond to endogenous/exogenous environmental factors at the mRNA level. They could be a potential source of data on environmental perturbation and have enough mRNA to analyze by current molecular biological techniques such as cDNA cloning or quantitative real-time PCR. Collection of blood samples and analysis of plasma are very common techniques, even for endangered species. If the investigators saved the blood cells properly after they transfer the plasma in any non-mammalian species, including endangered species, a component of the endogenous endocrine system could be studied. This could open various directions in research, such as comparing mRNA expression in blood cells with hormone concentrations in the plasma or comparing alterations in mRNA expression over bleeds. Indeed, in the American alligator, stress from constraint increased the concentrations of corticosterone and glucose in plasma. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA in whole blood cells collected from the same blood was detectable by quantitative real-time PCR, and GR mRNA was slightly induced at 8 h after stress from restraint (Kohno and Guillette, unpublished data). Further, the blood cells expressed enough mRNA to clone many of the steroid hormone receptors (e.g., ESR1, GR or AR). These results indicate that it would be possible to obtain and analyze the trans-activation of steroid hormone receptors cloned from blood cells of endangered species and further allow determination of whether a given species is at greater risk to environmental contaminants with agonistic or antagonistic steroid hormone potential. Such a study is in its initial stages for the Japanese Giant Salamander (Andrias japonicus), a national monument of Japan and a highly endangered species (Katsu et al. 2006aGo).


    Conclusion
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Two novel applications for cDNA cloning and trans-activation assays could make the functional analysis of steroid hormone receptors from endangered species possible. Cluster analysis, using ligand-receptor trans-activities is likely to provide new functional aspects of receptor-ligand interactions by grouping similar receptor function and/or ligand potential. Furthermore, it might be possible to estimate effects of, and risk to environmental contaminants via nuclear steroid hormone receptors on many vertebrate species, including threatened or endangered species.


    Funding
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported in part by grants to LJG (UF Opportunity Fund; NIEHS R21 ES014053-01A1; HHMI Professor Program) and TI (Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology; Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan; grants from the Ministry of Environment, Japan).


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Brandon C. Moore, Heather J. Hamlin, and Thea M. Edward, Department of Zoology, University of Florida, for their critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
From the symposium ‘‘Reptile Genomics and Evolutionary Genetics" presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 2–6, 2008, at San Antonio, Texas.


    References
 Top
 Synopsis
 Introduction
 Two different trans-activation...
 Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER...
 Androgen receptor (AR)
 A novel approach for...
 Conclusion
 Funding
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Bentley PJ. The chemical structure, polymorphism, and evolution of hormones. In: Comparative vertebrate endocrinology (1998) Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 65–175.

Bertrand S, Brunet FG, Escriva H, Parmentier G, Laudet V, Robinson-Rechavi M. Evolutionary genomics of nuclear receptors: from twenty-five ancestral genes to derived endocrine systems. Mol Biol Evol (2004) 21::1923–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blumberg B, Evans RM. Orphan nuclear receptors—new ligands and new possibilities. Genes Dev (1998) 12::3149–55.[Free Full Text]

Crain DA, Guillette LJ Jr, Rooney AA, Pickford DB. Alterations in steroidogenesis in alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) exposed naturally and experimentally to environmental contaminants. Environ Health Perspect (1997) 105::528–33.[Web of Science][Medline]

Crews D. Sex determination: where environment and genetics meet. Evol Dev (2003) 5::50–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Filardo EJ, Quinn JA, Bland KI, Frackelton AR Jr. Estrogen-induced activation of Erk-1 and Erk-2 requires the G protein-coupled receptor homolog, GPR30, and occurs via trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor through release of HB-EGF. Mol Endocrinol (2000) 14::1649–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gray LE Jr, Parks L, Lambright C, Orlando EF, Guillette LJ Jr. The effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on the reproduction and development of wildlife. In: Endocrine disrupters in the environment—Metzler M, ed. (2002) Heidelberg, MS: Springer-Verlag. 209–48.

Guillette LJ Jr, Crain DA, Gunderson MP, Kools SAE, Milnes MR, Orlando EF, Rooney AA, Woodward AR. Alligators and endocrine disrupting contaminants: a current perspective. Am Zool (2000) 40::438–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Guillette LJ Jr, Edwards TM, Moore BC. Alligators, contaminants and steroid hormones. Environ Sci (2007) 14::331–47.[Medline]

Guillette LJ Jr, Gunderson MP. Alterations in development of reproductive and endocrine systems of wildlife populations exposed to endocrine-disrupting contaminants. Reproduction (2001) 122::857–64.[Abstract]

Guillette LJ Jr, Vonier PM, McLachlan JA. Affinity of the alligator estrogen receptor for serum pesticide contaminants. Toxicology (2002) 181–2::151–4.

Hammes SR, Levin ER. Extranuclear steroid receptors: nature and actions. Endocr Rev (2007) 28::726–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katsu Y, Bermudez DS, Braun EL, Helbing C, Miyagawa S, Gunderson MP, Kohno S, Bryan TA, Guillette LJ Jr, Iguchi T. Molecular cloning of the estrogen and progesterone receptors of the American alligator. Gen Comp Endocrinol (2004) 136::122–33.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Katsu Y, Hinago M, Sone K, Urushitani H, Guillette LJ Jr, Iguchi T. In vitro assessment of transcriptional activation of the estrogen and androgen receptors of mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis affinis. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2007a) 276::10–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Katsu Y, Ichikawa R, Ikeuchi T, Kohno S, Guillette LJ Jr, Iguchi T. Molecular cloning and characterization of estrogen, androgen, and progesterone nuclear receptors from a freshwater turtle (Pseudemys nelsoni). Endocrinology (2008) 149::161–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katsu Y, et al. Molecular cloning of estrogen receptor alpha (ER {alpha}; ESR1) of the Japanese giant salamander, Andrias japonicus. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2006a) 257–8::84–94.

Katsu Y, Lange A, Urushitani H, Ichikawa R, Paull GC, Cahill LL, Jobling S, Tyler CR, Iguchi T. Functional associations between two estrogen receptors, environmental estrogens, and sexual disruption in the roach (Rutilus rutilus). Environ Sci Technol (2007b) 41::3368–74.[Medline]

Katsu Y, Myburgh J, Kohno S, Swan GE, Guillette LJ Jr, Iguchi T. Molecular cloning of estrogen receptor alpha of the Nile crocodile. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol (2006b) 143::340–6.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kohno S, Bermudez DS, Katsu Y, Iguchi T, Guillette LJ Jr. Gene expression patterns in juvenile American alligators. In: (Alligator mississippiensis) exposed to environmental contaminants (2008) Aquat Toxicol 88:95–101.

Kregenow F. Transport in avian red cells. In: Membrane transport in red cells—Elloy J, Lew V, eds. (1977) New York: Academic Press. 383–426.

Krust A, Green S, Argos P, Kumar V, Walter P, Bornert JM, Chambon P. The chicken oestrogen receptor sequence: homology with v-erbA and the human oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors. EMBO J (1986) 5::891–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kuiper GG, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JA. Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1996) 93::5925–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Milnes MR, Bermudez DS, Bryan TA, Edwards TM, Gunderson MP, Larkin IL, Moore BC, Guillette LJ Jr. Contaminant-induced feminization and demasculinization of nonmammalian vertebrate males in aquatic environments. Environ Res (2006) 100::3–17.[Medline]

Norris DO. The chemistry of steroid hormones. In: Vertebrate endocrinology (1980) Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. 284–99.

O'Lone R, Frith MC, Karlsson EK, Hansen U. Genomic targets of nuclear estrogen receptors. Mol Endocrinol (2004) 18::1859–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pedram A, Razandi M, Sainson RC, Kim JK, Hughes CC, Levin ER. A conserved mechanism for steroid receptor translocation to the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem (2007) 282::22278–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pratt WB, Toft DO. Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. Endocr Rev (1997) 18::306–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Razandi M, Alton G, Pedram A, Ghonshani S, Webb P, Levin ER. Identification of a structural determinant necessary for the localization and function of estrogen receptor alpha at the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol (2003) 23::1633–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Revankar CM, Cimino DF, Sklar LA, Arterburn JB, Prossnitz ER. A transmembrane intracellular estrogen receptor mediates rapid cell signaling. Science (2005) 307::1625–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rooney AA, Guillette LJ Jr. Contaminant interactions with steroid receptors: evidence for receptor binding. In: Endocrine disrupting contaminants: an evolutionary perspective—Guillette LJ Jr, Crain DA, eds. (2000) Philadelphia, PA: Francis and Taylor Inc. 82–125.

Thomas P, Dressing G, Pang Y, Berg H, Tubbs C, Benninghoff A, Doughty K. Progestin, estrogen and androgen G-protein coupled receptors in fish gonads. Steroids (2006) 71::310–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tyler CR, Jobling S, Sumpter JP. Endocrine disruption in wildlife: a critical review of the evidence. Crit Rev Toxicol (1998) 28::319–61.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vonier PM, Crain DA, McLachlan JA, Guillette LJ Jr, Arnold SF. Interaction of environmental chemicals with the estrogen and progesterone receptors from the oviduct of the American alligator. Environ Health Perspect (1996) 104::1318–22.[Web of Science][Medline]

Watson CS, Alyea RA, Jeng YJ, Kochukov MY. Nongenomic actions of low concentration estrogens and xenoestrogens on multiple tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2007) 274::1–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wessa P. Agglomerative nesting (v1.0.2) in free statistics software (v1.1.22-r6). (2008) Edition ed: Office for Research Development and Education. [cited 2008 May 21]. Available at http://www.wessa.net/rwasp_agglomerativehierarchicalclustering.wasp/.

Willingham E, Crews D. Sex reversal effects of environmentally relevant xenobiotic concentrations on the red-eared slider turtle, a species with temperature-dependent sex determination. Gen Comp Endocrinol (1999) 113::429–35.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Willingham E, Rhen T, Sakata JT, Crews D. Embryonic treatment with xenobiotics disrupts steroid hormone profiles in hatchling red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans). Environ Health Perspect (2000) 108::329–32.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yao HH, Capel B. Temperature, genes, and sex: a comparative view of sex determination in Trachemys scripta and Mus musculus. J Biochem (2005) 138::5–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Young LJ, Godwin J, Grammer M, Gahr M, Crews D. Reptilian sex steroid receptors: amplification, sequence and expression analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (1995) 55::261–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhu Y, Bond J, Thomas P. Identification, classification, and partial characterization of genes in humans and other vertebrates homologous to a fish membrane progestin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100::2237–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/4/527    most recent
icn080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohno, S.
Right arrow Articles by Guillette, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?