Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1987 27(3):853-865; doi:10.1093/icb/27.3.853
© 1987 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TERMAN, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Intrinsic Behavioral and Physiological Differences Among Laboratory Populations of Prairie Deermice1

C. RICHARD TERMAN
Laboratory of Endocrinology and Population Ecology, Department of Biology, College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia 23185

The emphasis of this presentation is that social behavior is basically involved in the curtailment of growth of laboratory populations of prairie deermice through inhibiting influences on the reproductive development and function of population animals. Reproductive inhibition is not directly related to the numbers of animals present per se since physiological characteristics are similar between animals from populations differing widely in density under identical conditions of the physical environment. Thus, density should be interpreted relative to social or other behavioral factors and we should think of animals in a population in a qualitative as well as a quantitative sense. Population growth is controlled either by cessation of reproduction or by mortality of young and while 95% of the young remain reproductively immature and fail to reproduce, the weights and characteristics of their reproductive organs differ dependent upon the mechanism by which population growth is curtailed. Mechanisms of growth curtailment thus develop intrinsically to each population and involve communication through one or more of the senses of touch, smell, sight, hearing or taste. My data suggest that tactile cues from population animals (not necessarily overt aggression) may be of major importance in producing the reproductive retardation observed although chemosignals or other stimuli such as visual or auditory cues may act to slow reproductive recovery of inhibited animals. Data presented support the contention of a behavioral-physiological relationship distinct for each population.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.