Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1990 30(2):313-324; doi:10.1093/icb/30.2.313
© 1990 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TINSLEY, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Influence of Parasite Infection on Mating Success in Spadefoot Toads, Scaphiopus couchii1

RICHARD C. TINSLEY
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London University Mile End Road, London E1 4NS

The desert toads, Scaphiopus couchii, have an annual activity season of less than 8 weeks and experience only one significant parasite infection: the monogenean Pseudodiplorchis americanus is transmitted during host spawning and provides a natural system for testing the influence of parasite burden on host mating success. The 10 month hibernation involves total starvation during which the blood-feeding parasites reduce fat reserves and haematocrit. The toads emerge and spawn on the first night after rainfall, before they replenish depleted reserves. Male chorusing is energetically very demanding and mate selection, limited to a 7 hr nocturnal assembly, is determined principally by female choice. Parasite transmission triggered by host sexual activity results in 100% prevalence and high intensities of infection amongst males. Around 50% of toads lose their burdens entirely but the rest carry chronic infections throughout host hibernation. Field data show a consistent reduction in intensity each year strongly suggesting resistance. Parasite infection is pathogenic and creates extra stress during hibernation; therefore, to the extent that elimination of infection is heritable, toads entering spawning assemblies with heavy burdens should make poor mates. However, extensive field studies show no correlation between mate success and parasite burden. Although infection can prejudice survival, it is only one of several inter-related factors (including feeding success, tolerance of hibernation). The condition of successful and unsuccessful males in spawning assemblies indicates that all exceed a threshold at which parasite-induced pathology is significant. Males which are debilitated by infection—or other factors—are selected against before mate choice begins


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.