Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2002 42(4):872-880; doi:10.1093/icb/42.4.872
© 2002 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wethey, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Biogeography, Competition, and Microclimate: The Barnacle Chthamalus fragilis in New England1

David S. Wethey2,1
1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208

Geographic limits of species are commonly associated with climatic or physical boundaries, but the mechanisms of exclusion at the limits of distribution are poorly understood. In some intertidal populations, the strengths of interactions with natural enemies are mediated by microclimate, and determine geographic limits. The northern limit of the barnacle Chthamalus fragilis in New England is the south side of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. South of the cape, Chthamalus has a refuge from competition in the high intertidal, which is too hot for survival of its superior competitor Semibalanus balanoides. North of the cape, the high intertidal is cooler, and Semibalanus survives, so Chthamalus has no refuge. Thus, geographic variation in the strength of competition may determine the geographic limit of Chthamalus. Intolerance of cold by Chthamalus cannot account for the geographic limit: transplants of Chthamalus 80 km beyond its northern limit survived up to 8 yr in the absence of competition with Semibalanus. At the geographic limit of Chthamalus in the Cape Cod Canal there are two bridges, 5 km apart. On the southern bridge, Chthamalus is abundant and occupies a refuge above Semibalanus. On the northern bridge in 2001, only 7 individual Chthamalus were present. Despite the proximity of the bridges, their microclimates are very different. The southern bridge, where Chthamalus is abundant, is up to 8°C hotter than the northern bridge. This higher temperature creates a refuge in the high intertidal for Chthamalus. On the cooler northern bridge, there is no refuge for Chthamalus. Because of the difference in temperatures of the water masses that meet in the canal, heat storage in the rock of the bridge piers causes the temperatures to differ between the bridges. Thus, geographic change in microclimate alters the strength of competition, and determines the geographic limit.

"When we travel from south to north, or from a damp region to a dry, we invariably see some species gradually getting rarer and rarer, and finally disappearing; and the change in climate being conspicuous, we are tempted to attribute the whole effect to its direct action. But this is a very false view: we forget that each species, even where it most abounds, is constantly suffering enormous destruction at some period of its life, from enemies or from competitors for the same place and food; and if these enemies or competitors be in the least degree favoured by any slight change of climate, they will increase in numbers, and as each area is already fully stocked with inhabitants, the other species will decrease."—Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859, p. 69.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
S. J. Jones, N. Mieszkowska, and D. S. Wethey
Linking Thermal Tolerances and Biogeography: Mytilus edulis (L.) at its Southern Limit on the East Coast of the United States
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2009; 217(1): 73 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. Helmuth
From cells to coastlines: how can we use physiology to forecast the impacts of climate change?
J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2009; 212(6): 753 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
J. Jost and B. Helmuth
Morphological and Ecological Determinants of Body Temperature of Geukensia demissa, the Atlantic Ribbed Mussel, and Their Effects On Mussel Mortality
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2007; 213(2): 141 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. W. Denny and C. D. G. Harley
Hot limpets: predicting body temperature in a conductance-mediated thermal system
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2409 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. W. Denny, L. P. Miller, and C. D. G. Harley
Thermal stress on intertidal limpets: long-term hindcasts and lethal limits
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2420 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. E. Gilman, D. S. Wethey, and B. Helmuth
Variation in the sensitivity of organismal body temperature to climate change over local and geographic scales
PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9560 - 9565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.