© 2002 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Flexible Wings and Fins: Bending by Inertial or Fluid-Dynamic Forces?1
1 Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington 98195-1800
Flapping flight and swimming in many organisms is accompanied by significant bending of flexible wings and fins. The instantaneous shape of wings and fins has, in turn, a profound effect on the fluid dynamic forces they can generate, with non-monotonic relationships between the pattern of deformation waves passing along the wing and the thrust developed. Many of these deformations arise, in part, from the passive mechanics of oscillating a flexible air- or hydrofoil. At the same time, however, their instantaneous shape may well emerge from details of the fluid loading. This issue—the extent to which there is feedback between the instantaneous wing shape and the fluid dynamic loading—is core to understanding flight control. We ask to what extent surface shape of wings and fins is controlled by structural mechanics versus fluid dynamic loading. To address this issue, we use a combination of computational and analytic methods to explore how bending stresses arising from inertial-elastic mechanisms compare to those stresses that arise from fluid pressure forces. Our analyses suggest that for certain combinations of wing stiffness, wing motions, and fluid density, fluid pressure stresses play a relatively minor role in determining wing shape. Nearly all of these combinations correspond to wings moving in air. The exciting feature provided by this analysis is that, for high Reynolds number motions where linear potential flow equations provide reasonable estimates of lift and thrust, we can finally examine how wing structure affects flight performance. Armed with this approach, we then show how modest levels of passive elasticity can affect thrust for a given level of energy input in the form of an inertial oscillation of a compliant foil.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Zhao, Q. Huang, X. Deng, and S. P. Sane Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings J R Soc Interface, August 19, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0200v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Vanella, T. Fitzgerald, S. Preidikman, E. Balaras, and B. Balachandran Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Hedrick and T. L. Daniel Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3114 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Gordon, J. R. Hove, and I. K. Bartol Dynamics and Energetics of Animal Swimming and Flying: Introduction Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2002; 42(5): 960 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|