© 2002 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Mechanics of Adhesion Through a Fibrillar Microstructure1
1 E356/317A, Experimental Station, CR&D, The DuPont Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0356
Many organisms have evolved a fibrillated interface for contact and adhesion as shown by several of the papers in this issue. For example, in the Gecko, this structure appears to give them the ability to adhere and separate from a variety of surfaces by relying only on weak van der Waals forces. Despite the low intrinsic energy of separating surfaces held together by van der Waals forces, these organisms are able to achieve remarkably strong adhesion. To help understand adhesion in such a case, we consider a simple model of a fibrillar interface. For it, we examine the mechanics of contact and adhesion to a substrate. It appears that this structure allows the organism, at the same time, to achieve good, ‘universal’ contact and adhesion. Due to buckling, a carpet of fibrils behaves like a plastic solid under compressive loading, allowing intimate contact in the presence of some roughness. As an adhesive, we conjecture that energy in the fibrils is lost upon decohesion and unloading. This mechanism can add considerably to the intrinsic work of fracture, resulting in good adhesion even with only van der Waals forces. Analysis of the mechanics of adhesion through such a fibrillar interface provides rules for the design of the microstructure for desired performance as an adhesive.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1876 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Long and C.-Y Hui The effect of preload on the pull-off force in indentation tests of microfibre arrays Proc R Soc A, March 8, 2009; 465(2103): 961 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Liu, C.-Y. Hui, L. Shen, and A. Jagota Compliance of a microfibril subjected to shear and normal loads J R Soc Interface, September 6, 2008; 5(26): 1087 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Yao, G. D. Rocca, P.R Guduru, and H Gao Adhesion and sliding response of a biologically inspired fibrillar surface: experimental observations J R Soc Interface, July 6, 2008; 5(24): 723 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. K Porwal and C. Y. Hui Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate J R Soc Interface, April 6, 2008; 5(21): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.L Noderer, L Shen, S Vajpayee, N.J Glassmaker, A Jagota, and C.-Y Hui Enhanced adhesion and compliance of film-terminated fibrillar surfaces Proc R Soc A, October 8, 2007; 463(2086): 2631 - 2654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Autumn, C. Majidi, R. E. Groff, A. Dittmore, and R. Fearing Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3558 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Federle Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2006; 209(14): 2611 - 2621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.W Rizzo, K.H Gardner, D.J Walls, N.M Keiper-Hrynko, T.S Ganzke, and D.L Hallahan Characterization of the structure and composition of gecko adhesive setae J R Soc Interface, June 22, 2006; 3(8): 441 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Tang, C.-Y. Hui, and N. J Glassmaker Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one? J R Soc Interface, December 22, 2005; 2(5): 505 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|