Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2003 43(3):470-477; doi:10.1093/icb/43.3.470
© 2003 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsolver, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gomulkiewicz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Environmental Variation and Selection on Performance Curves1

Joel G. Kingsolver2,1 and Richard Gomulkiewicz2,3
1 Department of Biology, CB-3280, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
2 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164
3 Department of Mathematics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164

Many aspects of physiological and organismal performance vary with some continuous environmental variable: e.g., photosynthetic rate as a function of light intensity; growth rate or sprint speed as a function of temperature. For such ‘performance curves’, the environment plays two roles: it affects both the levels of performance expressed, and the relationship between performance and fitness. How does environmental variation within a generation determine natural selection on performance curves? We describe an approach to this question that has three components. First, we quantify natural environmental variation and assess its impact on performance in the field. Second, we develop a simple theoretical model that predicts how fine-grained environmental variation determines selection on performance curves. Third, we describe how directional selection on performance curves may be estimated and compared to theoretical predictions. We illustrate these steps using data on performance curves of short-term growth rate as a function of temperature (thermal performance curves) in Pieris caterpillars. We use this approach to explore whether selection acts primarily on growth rate at specific temperatures, or on more integrated aspects of growth.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
K. Meyer and M. Kirkpatrick
Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits
Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2005; 360(1459): 1443 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. G. Kingsolver, R. Izem, and G. J. Ragland
Plasticity of Size and Growth in Fluctuating Thermal Environments: Comparing Reaction Norms and Performance Curves
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 450 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.