Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2004 44(5):349-357; doi:10.1093/icb/44.5.349
© 2004 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santini, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


The Importance of Even Highly Incomplete Fossil Taxa in Reconstructing the Phylogenetic Relationships of the Tetraodontiformes (Acanthomorpha: Pisces)1

Francesco Santini2,1 and James C. Tyler2
1 Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, M5S 3G5, Canada
2 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0106

The use of fossils in the phylogenetics of extant clades traditionally has been a contentious issue. Fossils usually are relatively incomplete, and their use commonly leads to an increase in the number of equally most parsimonious trees and a decrease in the resolution of phylogenies. Fossils alone, however, provide certain kinds of information about the biological history of a clade, and computer simulations have shown that even highly incomplete material can, under certain circumstances, increase the accuracy of a phylogeny, rather than decrease it.

Because empirical data are still scarce on the effects of the inclusion of fossils on phylogenetic reconstructions, we attempted to investigate this problem by using a relatively well-known group of acanthomorph fishes, the Tetraodontiformes (triggerfishes, pufferfishes, and ocean sunfishes), for which robust phylogenies using extant taxa already exist and that has a well-studied fossil record. Adding incomplete fossil taxa of tetraodontiforms usually increases the number of equally most parsimonious trees and often decreases the resolution of consensus trees. However, adding fossil taxa may help to correctly establish relationships among lineages that have experienced high degrees of morphological diversification by allowing for a reinterpretation of homologous and homoplastic features, increasing the resolution rather than decreasing it. Furthermore, taxa that were scored for 25% or more of their characters did not cause a significant loss of resolution, while providing unique biological information.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. Dornburg, F. Santini, and M. E. Alfaro
The Influence of Model Averaging on Clade Posteriors: An Example Using the Triggerfishes (Family Balistidae)
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 905 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. Cobbett, M. Wilkinson, and M. A Wills
Fossils Impact as Hard as Living Taxa in Parsimony Analyses of Morphology
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 753 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. S. Manos, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, S. R. Manchester, S.-H. Oh, C. D. Bell, D. L. Dilcher, and D. E. Stone
Phylogeny of Extant and Fossil Juglandaceae Inferred from the Integration of Molecular and Morphological Data Sets
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 412 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.