| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Impacts of Shading on Sponge-Cyanobacteria Symbioses: A Comparison between Host-Specific and Generalist Associations1
1 Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-1170
The marine sponge Lamellodysidea chlorea contains large populations of the host-specific, filamentous cyanobacterium Oscillatoria spongeliae. Other marine sponges, including Xestospongia exigua, contain the generalist, unicellular cyanobacterium Synechococcus spongiarum. The impact of cyanobacterial photosynthesis on host sponges was manipulated by shading these sponge-cyanobacteria associations. If cyanobacteria benefit their hosts, shading should reduce this benefit. Chlorophyll a concentrations were measured as an index of cyanobacterial abundance. After two weeks, shaded L. chlorea lost more mass than controls, while shaded and control X. exigua did not lose a significant amount of mass. Chlorophyll a concentrations in shaded X. exigua were lower than in controls, but were not significantly different between shaded and control L. chlorea. In addition, L. chlorea shaded in situ lost over 40% of their initial area, but did not differ in chlorophyll a concentrations from controls. These results suggest that Oscillatoria symbionts benefit their host sponges in a mutualistic association. Synechococcus symbionts may be commensals that exploit the resources provided by their sponge hosts without significantly affecting sponge mass. When shaded, Synechococcus symbionts may be consumed by their hosts or may be able to disperse from this unfavorable environment. These data support the hypothesis that more specialized symbionts provide a greater benefit to their hosts, but hypotheses concerning the dispersal abilities of these symbionts remain to be explored. Sponge-cyanobacteria symbioses provide model systems for investigating the costs and benefits of symbiosis and the roles of dispersal, environmental conditions, and phylogenetic history in determining the specificity of endosymbionts for their hosts.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Mohamed, J. J. Enticknap, J. E. Lohr, S. M. McIntosh, and R. T. Hill Changes in Bacterial Communities of the Marine Sponge Mycale laxissima on Transfer into Aquaculture Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2008; 74(4): 1209 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Neuweiler, I. Daoust, P.-A. Bourque, and D. J. Burdige Degradative Calcification of a Modern Siliceous Sponge from the Great Bahama Bank, The Bahamas: A Guide for Interpretation of Ancient Sponge-Bearing Limestones Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2007; 77(7): 552 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Taylor, R. Radax, D. Steger, and M. Wagner Sponge-Associated Microorganisms: Evolution, Ecology, and Biotechnological Potential Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2007; 71(2): 295 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


