Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005 45(5):895-902; doi:10.1093/icb/45.5.895
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Tang-Martinez, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology

Bateman Gradients in Field and Laboratory Studies: A Cautionary Tale1

Patricia G. Parker2,1 and Zuleyma Tang-Martinez1
1 Department of Biology, University of Missouri–St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63121

Since tools of molecular genetics became readily available, our understanding of bird mating systems has undergone a revolution. The majority of passerine species investigated are socially monogamous, but have been shown to be genetically polygamous. Data sets from natural populations of juncos suggest that multiple mating by females results in a sexual selection gradient as steep for females as for males (a result that does not support Bateman's predictions). However, in males, fitness is enhanced directly through fertilization success with multiple matings; in females fitness benefits may be enhanced immediately through direct access to food, protection against predators, or other resources received from males, or they may be delayed through improvement in offspring quality (e.g., through good genes, or greater genetic compatibility between the female and the extra-pair male). But a steep sexual selection gradient for females can be difficult to interpret. If all females copulate with multiple partners that are equally likely to fertilize eggs, then females that produce larger clutch sizes, for any reason, will appear to have copulated with more males. That is, multiple sires have a higher probability of detection in larger clutches than in smaller ones, giving the impression that females that mate with multiple males increase their reproductive success. Yet, in most studies in which there is a correlation between number of offspring produced by females and number of extra-pair males, causation has not been clearly established and other factors may explain the results. Additional complications in understanding male and female reproductive strategies are: (1) Molecular studies cannot detect extra-pair copulations that did not result in fertilizations; yet if a female acquires food or other resources from extra-pair males, such extra-pair matings may have significant effects on female fitness. Thus, molecular studies provide only a conservative estimate of the number of extra-pair copulations or "mates" that a female has. (2) Clutch size affects the probability that any given male will be successful in fertilizing a female's eggs. Specifically, at any given point, a male's chances of fertilizing at least one egg in the female's clutch will be greater as clutch size increases. We predict that in avian species with small clutch sizes, males may be selected to be choosy and avoid extra-pair copulations, while females should be selected to be less discriminating. Moreover, if extra-pair males provide resources that increase female fitness, the females should seek extra-pair copulations, whether or not the males are likely to fertilize any of her eggs.

Laboratory studies with insects have yielded clearer evidence of the causal relationship between multiple mating and increased female fitness. We review studies on a tenebrionid beetle in which female fecundity increases directly with number of mates. In these experiments, the nutritive value of the spermatophores does not fully explain the increase in female reproductive success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. G. Jones and N. L. Ratterman
Colloquium Papers: Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin?
PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(Supplement_1): 10001 - 10008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
Z. Tang-Martinez and T. B. Ryder
The Problem with Paradigms: Bateman's Worldview as a Case Study
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.