Skip Navigation


Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on June 25, 2007
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2007 47(2):272-284; doi:10.1093/icb/icm061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/2/272    most recent
icm061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Vive le difference! Sexual dimorphism and adaptive patterns in lizards of the genus Anolis

Marguerite A. Butler1
Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2538 McCarthy Mall, Edmonson 152, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Correspondence: 1E-mail: mbutler{at}hawaii.edu

The repeated, convergent evolution of body shape and microhabitat use in Greater Antillean lizards of the genus Anolis (anoles) provides compelling evidence of the importance of microhabitat specialization in shaping morphology. Interestingly, sexual dimorphism is also extensive, with males and females differing in body size as well as in shape. It is important to note that the components of shape analyzed in these studies is related to locomotion and are size-adjusted, including: relative limb and body lengths and mass of the body. Numbers of lamellae were also used and these do not vary with size. Furthermore, dimorphism in both size and shape differs by habitat type. Thus, does functionally-relevant sexual dimorphism imply that one sex is the "ecological" sex, with the other being maladapted to it's environment? Alternatively, sexual dimorphism may interact with adaptive diversification. Different classes of individuals within a species may act as separate ecological units if they play ecologically different roles. Here, I reanalyze a data set of morphological data for 15 species of Puerto Rican and Jamaican Anolis, which represent two largely independent adaptive radiations of lizards. I test for concordance between size and shape dimorphism and microhabitat (ecomorph) type, and for "parallel" patterns of sexual dimorphism among species. I integrate these results and, in the light of previous research, evaluate the relative influence that larger-scale ecological patterns have on sexual dimorphism, as well as the influence of sexual dimorphism on community structuring. I conclude that the presence of ecologically-relevant dimorphism may in fact increase the adaptive diversity present within a community.


From the symposium "Ecological Dimorphisms in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes" presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integration and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2007, at Phoenix, Arizona.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.