<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Integrative and Comparative Biology - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Integrative and Comparative Biology - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1557-7023</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Integrative and Comparative Biology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1540-7063</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn026v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn035v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn031v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn030v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn022v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn042v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn034v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn021v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn029v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn028v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn020v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn019v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn018v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn014v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn017v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn011v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn010v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn007v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm107v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn005v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn006v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn003v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn001v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn002v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm106v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm101v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm102v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm103v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm100v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn026v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Teaching evolution: challenging religious preconceptions]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn026v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Teaching college students about the nature of science should not be a controversial exercise. College students are expected to distinguish between astronomy and astrology, chemistry and alchemy, evolution and creationism. In practice, however, the conflict between creationism and the nature of science may create controversy in the classroom, even walkouts, when the subject of evolution is raised. The authors have grappled with the meaning of such behaviors. They surveyed 538 students in a public, liberal arts college. Pre/post course surveys were analyzed to track changes in student responses to questions that were either consistent or inconsistent with the Theory of Evolution after a semester of instruction in a college biology or zoology course in which evolution was taught. Many students who were initially undecided about issues regarding evolution had shifted in their viewpoints by the end of the course. It was found that more education about the evidence for and the mechanics of evolutionary processes did not necessarily move students toward a scientific viewpoint. The authors also discovered a "wedge" effect among students who were undecided about questions pertaining to human ancestry at the beginning of the course. About half of these students shifted to a scientific viewpoint at the end of the course; the other half shifted toward agreement with statements consistent with creationism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lovely, E. C., Kondrick, L. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Teaching evolution: challenging religious preconceptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn035v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding signal design during the pursuit of aerial insects by echolocating bats: tools and applications]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn035v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Bats are among the few predators that can exploit the large quantities of aerial insects active at night. They do this by using echolocation to detect, localize, and classify targets in the dark. Echolocation calls are shaped by natural selection to match ecological challenges. For example, bats flying in open habitats typically emit calls of long duration, with long pulse intervals, shallow frequency modulation, and containing low frequencies&mdash;all these are adaptations for long-range detection. As obstacles or prey are approached, call structure changes in predictable ways for several reasons: calls become shorter, thereby reducing overlap between pulse and echo, and calls change in shape in ways that minimize localization errors. At the same time, such changes are believed to support recognition of objects. Echolocation and flight are closely synchronized: we have monitored both features simultaneously by using stereo photogrammetry and videogrammetry, and by acoustic tracking of flight paths. These methods have allowed us to quantify the intensity of signals used by free-living bats, and illustrate systematic changes in signal design in relation to obstacle proximity. We show how signals emitted by aerial feeding bats can be among the most intense airborne sounds in nature. Wideband ambiguity functions developed in the processing of signals produce two-dimensional functions showing trade-offs between resolution of time and velocity, and illustrate costs and benefits associated with Doppler sensitivity and range resolution in echolocation. Remarkably, bats that emit broadband calls can adjust signal design so that Doppler-related overestimation of range compensates for underestimation of range caused by the bat's movement in flight. We show the potential of our methods for understanding interactions between echolocating bats and those prey that have evolved ears that detect bat calls.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holderied, M. W., Baker, C. J., Vespe, M., Jones, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding signal design during the pursuit of aerial insects by echolocating bats: tools and applications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn031v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution of the gene network underlying gonadogenesis in turtles with temperature-dependent and genotypic sex determination]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn031v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The evolution of sex determination has long fascinated biologists, as it has paramount consequences for the evolution of a multitude of traits, from sex allocation to speciation and extinction. Explaining the diversity of sex-determining systems found in vertebrates (genotypic or GSD and temperature-dependent or TSD) requires a comprehensive and integrative examination from both a functional and an evolutionary perspective. Particularly revealing is the examination of the gene network that regulates gonadogenesis. Here, I review some advances in this field and propose some additional hypotheses about the composition of the gene network underlying sexual development, the functional links among some of its elements and their evolution in turtles. I focus on several pending questions about: (1) What renders TSD systems thermo-sensitive? (2) Is there one developmentally conserved or multiple TSD mechanisms? (3) Have evolutionarily derived GSD species lost all ancestral thermal-sensitivity? New data are presented on embryonic expression of <I>Dax1</I> (the dosage-sensitive sex-reversal adrenal hypoplasia congenital on the X chromosome gene in the turtles <I>Chrysemys picta</I> (TSD) and <I>Apalone mutica</I> (GSD). No differential <I>Dax1</I> expression was detected in <I>C. picta</I> at any of the stages examined, consistent with reports on two other TSD turtles and alligators. Notably, significantly higher <I>Dax1</I> expression was found at 30&deg;C than at 25&deg;C at stage 15 in <I>A. mutica</I> (GSD), likely caused by <I>Wt1's</I> identical expression pattern previously reported. Because <I>Sf1</I> is an immediate downstream target of <I>Dax1</I> and its expression is not affected by temperature, it is proposed that <I>Sf1</I> renders <I>Dax1's</I> differential signal ineffective to induce biased sex ratios in <I>A. mutica</I>, as previously proposed for <I>Wt1's</I> thermosensitive expression. Thus, it is hypothesized that <I>Sf1</I> plays a major role in the lack of response of sex ratio to temperature of <I>A. mutica</I>, and may function as a sex-determining gene in this GSD species. These and previous data permit formulating several mechanistic hypotheses: (1) the postulation of <I>Wt1</I> as a candidate thermal master switch alone, or in combination with <I>Sf1</I>, in the TSD turtle <I>C. picta</I>; (2) the proposition of <I>Sf1</I> as a sex-determining gene in the GSD turtle <I>A. mutica</I>; and (3) the hypothesis that differing patterns of gene expression among TSD taxa reflect multiple traits from a developmental perspective. Moreover, the recent finding of relic differential <I>Wt1</I> expression in <I>A. mutica</I> and the results for <I>Dax1</I> in this species provide empirical evidence that GSD taxa can harbor thermal sensitivity at the level of gene expression, potentially co-optable during TSD evolution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valenzuela, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution of the gene network underlying gonadogenesis in turtles with temperature-dependent and genotypic sex determination]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn030v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Flying high--assessing the use of the aerosphere by bats]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn030v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Bats feature prominently among organisms that occupy the aerosphere as they extensively use this environment for foraging, but also for dispersal, migration, and behavioral interactions. Differential use of the aerosphere is an important factor structuring bat assemblages, with species exhibiting distinct morphological, physiological, and sensory adaptations to different habitat types. This necessitates comprehensive sampling methodologies such as combined ground-level and canopy-level mist netting as well as acoustic monitoring to assess the presence, diversity, and activity of different functional groups of species adequately. Recent technological advances in acoustic detection and in methods of analysis, coupled with the expansion of libraries of echolocation calls for species identification, now allow for the reliable quantification of species numbers and activity of the scarcely known group of aerial insectivorous bats, particularly in species-rich tropical assemblages. We provide a brief, exemplary overview of recent studies on bats conducted in Panam&aacute; to demonstrate the necessity of comprehensive sampling methods and application of new technologies in order to adequately depict assemblage composition and responses of bats to structural changes in habitats induced by fragmentation. In addition to acoustic methods, miniaturization of radio transmitters has provided new insights into the patterns of spatial use of the aerosphere by bats and has identified species-specific differences in mobility as one of the important traits that determines bats&rsquo; reactions to anthropogenic alterations of the landscape. Following the goals of the symposium on aeroecology, we propose new avenues of research for probing the aerosphere. We discuss how integration of a diverse array of remote sensing tools with data on species distribution and species traits, such as mobility and edge-sensitivity, might provide novel opportunities for the development, and application of conservation-oriented monitoring systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalko, E. K. V., Villegas, S. E., Schmidt, M., Wegmann, M., Meyer, C. F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Flying high--assessing the use of the aerosphere by bats]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn022v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variation in EMG Activity: A Hierarchical Approach]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn022v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recordings of naturally occurring Electromyographic (EMG) signals are variable. One of the first formal and successful attempts to quantify variation in EMG signals was Shaffer and Lauder's (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="B31">1985</cross-ref>) study examining several levels of variation but not within muscle. The goal of the current study was to quantify the variation that exists at different levels, using more detailed measures of EMG activity than did Shaffer and Lauder (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="B31">1985</cross-ref>). The importance of accounting for different levels of variation in an EMG study is both biological and statistical. Signal variation within the same muscle for a stereotyped action suggests that each recording represents a sample drawn from a pool of a large number of motor units that, while biologically functioning in an integrated fashion, showed statistical variation. Different levels of variation for different muscles could be related to different functions or different tasks of those muscles. The statistical impact of unaccounted or inappropriately analyzed variation can lead to false rejection (type I error) or false acceptance (type II error) of the null hypothesis. Type II errors occur because such variation will accrue to the error, reducing power, and producing an artificially low <I>F</I>-value. Type I errors are associated with pseudoreplication, in which the replicated units are not truly independent, thereby leading to inflated degrees of freedom, and an underestimate of the error mean square. To address these problems, we used a repeated measures, nested multifactor model to measure the relative contribution of different hierarchical levels of variation to the total variation in EMG signals during swallowing. We found that variation at all levels, among electrodes in the same muscle, in sequences of the same animal, and among individuals and between differently named muscles, was significant. These findings suggest that a single intramuscular electrode, recording from a limited sample of the motor units, cannot be relied upon to characterize the activity of an entire muscle. Furthermore, the use of both a repeated-measures model, to avoid pseudoreplication, and a nested model, to account for variation, is critical for a correct testing of biological hypotheses about differences in EMG signals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[German, R. Z., Crompton, A. W., Thexton, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variation in EMG Activity: A Hierarchical Approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn042v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Environmental Constraints upon Locomotion and Predator-prey Interactions in Aquatic Organisms. Paolo Domenici, Guy Claireaux, and David J. McKenzie, editors.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn042v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kot, B. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Environmental Constraints upon Locomotion and Predator-prey Interactions in Aquatic Organisms. Paolo Domenici, Guy Claireaux, and David J. McKenzie, editors.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn034v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A proposed role of the sulfotransferase/sulfatase pathway in modulating yolk steroid effects]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn034v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Steroid hormones have long been studied by behavioral ecologists as a nongenetic means whereby females can influence the development of their offspring. In oviparous vertebrates, steroids are present in the yolk at the time of oviposition and have been shown to affect numerous traits of the offspring. To date, most studies have focused on the functional relationship between yolk steroids and offspring development. In this article we used a mechanistic approach to investigate the effects of yolk steroids in an attempt to decipher how lipophilic steroids may make it from the lipid-rich yolk to the developing embryo. First, we examined the distribution of radioactive and nonradioactive estradiol following the exogenous application of each to developing eggs of the red-eared slider. Second, we quantified sulfotransferase activity in various components of the egg as a potential mechanism for the metabolism of steroids. Results indicate that exogenous estradiol is converted to a water-soluble form during the first 15 days of development, concurrent with an increase of sulfotransferase activity in the yolk and extra-embryonic membranes. Based on these data, we propose a mechanistic model based upon the sulfotransferase/sulfatase pathway as a means through which developing eggs can convert steroids to a water-soluble form that can be transported to the embryo. These sulfonated steroids may then serve as precursors for subsequent steroid production via sulfatase activity. This model utilizes a mechanism known to be important for the modulation of maternal steroid signals in placental mammals, at the same time addressing several previously unanswered questions regarding the mechanisms underlying the effects of yolk steroids.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paitz, R. T., Bowden, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A proposed role of the sulfotransferase/sulfatase pathway in modulating yolk steroid effects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn021v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection and discrimination of fauna in the aerosphere using Doppler weather surveillance radar]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn021v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Organisms in the aerosphere have been detected by radar since its development in the 1940s. The national network of Doppler weather radars (WSR-88D) in the United States can readily detect birds, bats, and insects aloft. Level-II data from the radar contain information on the reflectivity and radial velocity of targets and on width of the spectrum (SD of radial velocities in a radar pulse volume). Information on reflectivity can be used to quantify density of organisms aloft and radial velocity can be used to discriminate different types of targets based on their air speeds. Spectral width can also provide some useful information when organisms with very different air speeds are aloft. Recent work with dual-polarization radar suggests that it may be useful for discriminating birds from insects in the aerosphere, but more development and biological validation are required.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gauthreaux, S. A., Livingston, J. W., Belser, C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection and discrimination of fauna in the aerosphere using Doppler weather surveillance radar]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trickle-down evolution: an approach to getting major evolutionary adaptive changes into textbooks and curricula]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although contemporary high school and college textbooks of biology generally cover the principles and data of microevolution (genetic and populational change) and speciation rather well, coverage of what is known of the major changes in evolution (macroevolution), and how the evidence is understood is generally poor to nonexistent. It is critical to improve this because acceptance of evolution by the American public rests on the understanding of how we know what we know about the emergence of major new taxonomic groups, and about their adaptations, behaviors, and ecologies in geologic time. An efficient approach to this problem is to improve the illustrations in college textbooks to show the consilience of different lines of fossil, morphological, and molecular evidence mapped on phylogenies. Such "evograms" will markedly improve traditional illustrations of phylogenies, "menageries," and "companatomies." If "evograms" are installed at the college level, the basic principles and evidence of macroevolution will be more likely taught in K-12, thus providing an essential missing piece in biological education.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Padian, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trickle-down evolution: an approach to getting major evolutionary adaptive changes into textbooks and curricula]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn036v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Head segmentation in vertebrates]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn036v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Classic theories of vertebrate head segmentation clearly exemplify the idealistic nature of comparative embryology prior to the 20th century. Comparative embryology aimed at recognizing the basic, primary structure that is shared by all vertebrates, either as an archetype or an ancestral developmental pattern. Modern evolutionary developmental (Evo-Devo) studies are also based on comparison, and therefore have a tendency to reduce complex embryonic anatomy into overly simplified patterns. Here again, a basic segmental plan for the head has been sought among chordates. We convened a symposium that brought together leading researchers dealing with this problem, in a number of different evolutionary and developmental contexts. Here we give an overview of the outcome and the status of the field in this modern era of Evo-Devo. We emphasize the fact that the head segmentation problem is not fully resolved, and we discuss new directions in the search for hints for a way out of this maze.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuratani, S., Schilling, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Head segmentation in vertebrates]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn029v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn029v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The ability to control the flow of water around the body dictates the performance of marine mammals in the aquatic environment. Morphological specializations of marine mammals afford mechanisms for passive flow control. Aside from the design of the body, which minimizes drag, the morphology of the appendages provides hydrodynamic advantages with respect to drag, lift, thrust, and stall. The flukes of cetaceans and sirenians and flippers of pinnipeds possess geometries with flexibility, which enhance thrust production for high efficiency swimming. The pectoral flippers provide hydrodynamic lift for maneuvering. The design of the flippers is constrained by performance associated with stall. Delay of stall can be accomplished passively by modification of the flipper leading edge. Such a design is exhibited by the leading edge tubercles on the flippers of humpback whales (<I>Megaptera novaeangliae</I>). These novel morphological structures induce a spanwise flow field of separated vortices alternating with regions of accelerated flow. The coupled flow regions maintain areas of attached flow and delay stall to high angles of attack. The delay of stall permits enhanced turning performance with respect to both agility and maneuverability. The morphological features of marine mammals for flow control can be utilized in the biomimetic design of engineered structures for increased power production and increased efficiency.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fish, F. E., Howle, L. E., Murray, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn028v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of spatial and ontogenetic morphological variation in the expansion of the geographic range of the tropical brown alga, Turbinaria ornata]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn028v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Like many reefs worldwide, reefs in French Polynesia are experiencing a shift from coral-dominated to algal-dominated systems. The macroalga <I>Turbinaria ornata</I> comprises the majority of the increasing algal biomass on the barrier reefs surrounding these islands, and its distribution is increasing throughout this region. Aspects of the ecomorphology of <I>Turbinaria</I> make it ideally suited to thrive under the physical conditions found across barrier reefs throughout French Polynesia. Spatial morphological variation allows <I>Turbinaria</I> to produce morphotypes that are suited either to the calm, unidirectional, slowly flowing water in the backreef or to the high-energy wave-driven flow of the forereef. Backreef plants are flexible and produce airbladders that make them buoyant, whereas forereef plants are not buoyant, but strong and stiff. Production of bladders and resulting buoyancy has been found to be a phenotypically plastic trait in response to movement of water and confers advantages to backreef plants and plays an important role in dispersal. Ontogenetic variation of buoyancy, material properties, and reproductive capacity is part of a dispersal strategy whereby fertile, buoyant fronds drift between oceanic islands and form new populations, thereby contributing to the recent expansion of range of <I>T. ornata</I> across French Polynesia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stewart, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of spatial and ontogenetic morphological variation in the expansion of the geographic range of the tropical brown alga, Turbinaria ornata]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The strength of the evidence supporting evolution has increased markedly since the discovery of DNA but, paradoxically, public resistance to accepting evolution seems to have become stronger. A key dilemma is that science faculty have often continued to teach evolution ineffectively, even as the evidence that traditional ways of teaching are inferior has become stronger and stronger. Three pedagogical strategies that together can make a large difference in students&rsquo; understanding and acceptance of evolution are extensive use of interactive engagement, a focus on critical thinking in science (especially on comparisons and explicit criteria) and using both of these in helping the students actively compare their initial conceptions (and publicly popular misconceptions) with more fully scientific conceptions. The conclusion that students&rsquo; misconceptions must be dealt with systematically can be difficult for faculty who are teaching evolution since much of the students&rsquo; resistance is framed in religious terms and one might be reluctant to address religious ideas in class. Applications to teaching evolution are illustrated with examples that address criteria and critical thinking, standard geology versus flood geology, evolutionary developmental biology versus organs of extreme perfection, and the importance of using humans as a central example. It is also helpful to bridge the false dichotomy, seen by many students, between atheistic evolution versus religious creationism. These applications are developed in detail and are intended to be sufficient to allow others to use these approaches in their teaching. Students and other faculty were quite supportive of these approaches as implemented in my classes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson, C. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn025v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: Limitations and insights]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn025v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Electromyography (EMG), or the study of muscle activation patterns, has long been used to infer central nervous system (CNS) control of the musculoskeletal system and the evolution of that control. As the activation of the muscles at the level of the periphery is a reflection of the interaction of descending influences and local reflex control, EMG is an important tool in integrated investigations of the evolution of coordination in complex, musculoskeletal systems. Yet, the use of EMG as a tool to understand the evolution of motor control has its limitations. We here review the potential limitations and opportunities of the use of EMG in studying the evolution of motor control in vertebrates and provide original previously unpublished data to illustrate this. The relative timing of activation of a set of muscles can be used to evaluate CNS coordination of the components in a musculoskeletal system. Studies of relative timing reveal task-dependent variability in the recruitment of different populations of muscle fibers (i.e., different fiber types) within a single muscle, and left&ndash;right asymmetries in activation that need to be taken into account in comparative studies. The magnitude of muscle recruitment is strongly influenced by the instantaneous demands imposed on the system, and is likely determined by local reflex-control systems. Consequently, using EMG to make meaningful inferences about evolutionary changes in musculoskeletal control requires comparisons across <I>similar functional tasks</I>. Moreover, our data show that inferences about the evolution of motor control are limited in their explanatory power without proper insights into the kinematics and dynamics of a system.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herrel, A., Schaerlaeken, V., Ross, C., Meyers, J., Nishikawa, K., Abdala, V., Manzano, A., Aerts, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: Limitations and insights]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn024v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characterization, chromosomal location, and genomic neighborhood of a ratite ortholog of a gene with gonadal expression in mammals]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn024v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A locus that we name SubA was discovered during large-scale sequencing and characterization of a bacterial artificial chromosome library from an emu, <I>Dromaius novaehollandiae</I>. This locus yields a significantly negative Tajima's D in emus and is conserved across emu, chicken, mouse, and human. Expression of SubA orthologs has been reported in human ovaries and in mouse testes, but remains unknown in emus. The locus was physically mapped onto a pair of microchromosomes in emus by fluorescent <I>in situ</I> hybridization and also in chicken as previously reported. By characterizing emu SubA in this article, we aim to improve current descriptions of the cascade of genes associated with avian sex differentiation. Future experimentation will report the expression of SubA in ratites, other birds, and nonavian reptiles.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janes, D. E., Ezaz, T., Marshall Graves, J. A., Edwards, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characterization, chromosomal location, and genomic neighborhood of a ratite ortholog of a gene with gonadal expression in mammals]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn020v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enlargement of the temporalis muscle and alterations in the lateral cranial vault]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn020v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that increased masticatory muscle accompanied morphologic changes in the temporal bone and squamosal suture. Ten mice deficient for the protein myostatin (Mstn &ndash;/&ndash;) had significantly increased skeletal muscle mass and were compared with nine controls (Mstn +/+). Variables measured include linear and areal metrics describing temporal size and temporal bone shape as well as the extent of the area of the squamosal suture that overlaps, or bevels, with parietal bones. Mstn&ndash;/&ndash; mice showed significantly larger temporalis muscles. Their temporal bones showed significantly decreased size as well as decreased beveling of the squamosal suture. These decreases were absolute as well as relative and were not restricted to either vertical or horizontal axes. The increased masticatory musculature of Myostatin-null mice had a shrinking effect on the temporal aspect of the cranium. These results are inconsistent with the interpretation that increased temporalis mass induces morphologic changes in temporal bone that compensate for putative increases in compressive forces transduced at this region. Rather than increase in the area of overlap between two calvarial bones, potential increase in biomechanical loading along the temporal squama led to a smaller bevel which would presumably weaken this joint. It is unclear why this is so. Either compressive forces are not anabolic to suture beveling or they do upregulate growth of the suture bevel, with compression not being the primary loading regime at this suture.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron, C. D., Maness, H., Yu, J. C., Hamrick, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enlargement of the temporalis muscle and alterations in the lateral cranial vault]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn019v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The control of reproductive physiology and behavior by gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn019v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) controls the reproductive physiology and behavior of vertebrates by stimulating synthesis and release of gonadotropin from the pituitary gland. In 2000, another hypothalamic neuropeptide, gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH), was discovered in quail and found to be an inhibiting factor for gonadotropin release. GnIH homologs are present in the brains of vertebrates, including birds, mammals, amphibians, and fish. These peptides, categorized as RF amide-related peptides (RFRPs), possess a characteristic LPXRF-amide (X = L or Q) motif at their C-termini. GnIH/RFRP precursor mRNA encodes a polypeptide that is possibly cleaved into three mature peptides in birds and two in mammals. The names of these peptides are GnIH, GnIH-related peptide-1 (GnIH-RP-1) and GnIH-RP-2 in birds, and RFRP-1 and RFRP-3 in mammals. GnIH/RFRP is synthesized in neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in birds and the dorsomedial hypothalamic area in mammals. GnIH neurons project to the median eminence, thus providing a functional neuroanatomical infrastructure to regulate anterior pituitary function. In quail, GnIH inhibits gonadal activity by decreasing synthesis and release of gonadotropin. The widespread distribution of GnIH/RFRP immunoreactive fibers in all animals tested suggests various actions within the brain. In accordance, GnIH/RFRP receptor mRNA is also expressed widely in the brain and the pituitary. GnIH/RFRP immunoreactive axon terminals are in probable contact with GnRH neurons in birds and mammals, and we recently demonstrated expression of GnIH receptor mRNA in GnRH-I and GnRH-II neurons in European starlings. Thus, GnIH/RFRP may also inhibit gonadotropin synthesis and release by inhibiting GnRH neurons in addition to having direct actions on the pituitary gland. Intracerebroventricular administration of GnIH/RFRP further inhibits reproductive behaviors in songbirds and rodents, possibly via direct actions on the GnRH system. The expression of GnIH/RFRP is regulated by melatonin which is an internal indicator of day length in vertebrates. Stress stimuli also regulate the expression of GnIH/RFRP in songbirds and rodents. Accordingly, GnIH/RFRP may serve as a transducer of environmental information and social interactions into endogenous physiology and behavior of the animal. Recently, it was shown that GnIH/RFRP and its receptor are also expressed in the gonads of birds, rodents and primates. In sum, the existing data suggest that GnIH/RFRP is an important mediator of reproductive function acting at the level of the brain, pituitary, and the gonad in birds and mammals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ubuka, T., McGuire, N. L., Calisi, R. M., Perfito, N., Bentley, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The control of reproductive physiology and behavior by gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn018v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gonadotropin-releasing hormone II: A multi-purpose neuropeptide]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn018v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Close to 30 forms of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and at least five GnRH receptors have been identified in a wide variety of vertebrates and some invertebrates. One form, now called GnRH II, has the broadest distribution and the most ancient and conserved phylogeny. The distribution of the neurons that produce this peptide are completely nonoverlapping with any other GnRH forms. Fibers that project from these neurons overlap with GnRH I cells and/or fibers in a few regions, but are primarily divergent. The musk shrew (<I>Suncus murinus</I>) continues to be the most tractable mammalian species to use for studies of the function of GnRH II. The brain of the musk shrew has two GnRH genes (I and II), two GnRH receptors (types-1 and -2), and two different behaviors can be influenced by central infusion of GnRH II, but not by GnRH I; receptivity and feeding. Here, we summarize research on the musk shrew relative to the behavioral functions of GnRH II. First, female musk shrews are continually sexually receptive by virtue of their lack of an ovarian and/or behavioral estrus cycle. This feature of their reproductive ecology may be related to their semi-tropical distribution and their breeding season is highly dependent on changes in the availability of food. When food is not abundant, females stop mating, but brief bouts of feeding reinstate reproductive behavior. Likewise, intake of food is related to GnRH II mRNA and peptide content in the brain; after mild food restriction both decline. When GnRH II is infused centrally, at times when its content is low, it can both enhance receptivity and inhibit food intake. Simultaneous administration of a type-1 antagonist does not change the effect of GnRH II and use of an analog (135-18) that is a specific GnRH II agonist as well as a type-1 antagonist has the same effect as the endogenous GnRH II peptide. We propose that GnRH II plays a critical role by orchestrating the coordination of reproduction with the availability of nutritional support for these activities. Humans are bombarded with copious nutritional opportunities and at present obesity is a larger threat to health in many parts of the world than is under nutrition. It is our hope that understanding neuropeptides such as GnRH II that regulate food intake can ultimately lead to products that may curb appetite and thus decrease obesity and related risks to health.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schneider, J. S., Rissman, E. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gonadotropin-releasing hormone II: A multi-purpose neuropeptide]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is the vertebrate head segmented?--evolutionary and developmental considerations]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Because of its basal position on the phylogenetic tree of vertebrates, the lamprey embryo would be expected to exhibit segmental head mesoderm. Recent observations, however, show that the lamprey does not have any somite-like segments in the head. Coelomic head cavities that are most conspicuous in elasmobranch embryos, do not appear to represent universal vertebrate traits. From the perspective of generative constraint, segmental structures in the vertebrate body can be classified into primary segments, which arise as segmental embryonic primordia such as somites and pharyngeal pouches, and secondary segments whose patterns are determined by the presence of primary segments. Secondary segments include neural crest derivatives and epibranchial placodes that are not initially segmented. The head mesoderm of vertebrates is secondarily regionalized into several domains that do not impose any secondary segmental patterns on other structures. Thus, the vertebrate head is characterized by a lack of segmental generative constraint in its mesoderm. Classical segmental theories are now refuted because they attempted to equate the vertebrate head with that of the amphioxus, whose rostral somites are considered primary segments, which are absent from vertebrates.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuratani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is the vertebrate head segmented?--evolutionary and developmental considerations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symposium introduction: Electromyography interpretation and limitations in functional analyses of musculoskeletal systems]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konow, N., Gerry, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symposium introduction: Electromyography interpretation and limitations in functional analyses of musculoskeletal systems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn014v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modes and scaling in aquatic locomotion]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn014v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Organisms spanning a 10<sup>7</sup>-fold range in length of the body engage in aquatic propulsion&mdash;swimming; they do so with several kinds of propulsors and take advantage of several different fluid mechanical mechanisms. A hierarchical classification of swimming modes can impose some order on this complexity. More difficult are the issues surrounding the different kinds of propulsive devices used by different organisms. These issues can be in part exposed by an examination of how speeds and accelerations scale with changes in body length, both for different lineages of swimmers and for all swimmers collectively. Clearly, fluid mechanical factors impose general rules and constraints; just as clearly, these only roughly anticipate actual scaling. Indeed, collections of data on scaling can serve as useful correctives for assumptions about functional mechanisms. They can also reveal size-dependent constraints on biological designs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vogel, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modes and scaling in aquatic locomotion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn017v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Biology of African Savannahs (Biology of Habitat Series). By Bryan Shorrocks]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn017v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorgeloh, W. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Biology of African Savannahs (Biology of Habitat Series). By Bryan Shorrocks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Head organization and the head/trunk relationship in protochordates: problems and prospects]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The fossil record has been an invaluable aid for reconstructing the major events of vertebrate evolution. There is no comparable record for protochordates, however, which severely limits our knowledge of their ancestral morphology, habits, and mode of life. The alternative is inference based on an interpretation of living protochordates but this is fraught with problems, not least being our own biases of what we think an ancestral chordate ought to look like. Relevant to the present symposium is the problem of head/trunk relationships and whether or not the myotomes of the trunk originally extended into the head in vertebrates. I will review what is currently known of patterns of innervation in tunicates and amphioxus in relation to Romer's somaticovisceral concept of the vertebrate body to show how little progress has been made in resolving this problem. There are, in contrast, surprisingly good prospects for solving some other puzzles concerning chordate origins. Dorsoventral inversion provides a good example. A consensus is now emerging, based largely on molecular data from hemichordates that casts new light on the asymmetry of the head in amphioxus. Specifically, the morphogenetic growth process that reestablishes symmetry in late-stage larvae can now be seen, at least in part, as a recapitulation of past evolutionary events, and this has important implications for the origin and basic organization of the brain.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lacalli, T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Head organization and the head/trunk relationship in protochordates: problems and prospects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture, 1500-1870. Staffan Muller-Wille and Hans-Jorg Rheinberger, editors.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richmond, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture, 1500-1870. Staffan Muller-Wille and Hans-Jorg Rheinberger, editors.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn011v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal strategies for insects migrating in the flight boundary layer: mechanisms and consequences]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn011v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Directed aerial displacement requires that a volant organism's airspeed exceeds ambient wind speed. For biologically relevant altitudes, wind speed increases exponentially with increased height above the ground. Thus, dispersal of most insects is influenced by atmospheric conditions. However, insects that fly close to the Earth's surface displace within the flight boundary layer where insect airspeeds are relatively high. Over the past 17 years, we have studied boundary-layer insects by following individuals as they migrate across the Caribbean Sea and the Panama Canal. Although most migrants evade either drought or cold, nymphalid and pierid butterflies migrate across Panama near the onset of the rainy season. Dragonflies of the genus <I>Pantala</I> migrate in October concurrently with frontal weather systems. Migrating the furthest and thereby being the most difficult to study, the diurnal moth <I>Urania fulgens</I> migrates between Central and South America. Migratory butterflies and dragonflies are capable of directed movement towards a preferred compass direction in variable winds, whereas the moths drift with winds over water. Butterflies orient using both global and local cues. Consistent with optimal migration theory, butterflies and dragonflies adjust their flight speeds in ways that maximize migratory distance traveled per unit fuel, whereas the moths do not. Moreover, only butterflies adjust their flight speed in relation to endogenous fat reserves. It is likely that these insects use optic flow to gauge their speed and drift, and thus must migrate where sufficient detail in the Earth's surface is visible to them. The abilities of butterflies and dragonflies to adjust their airspeed over water indicate sophisticated control and guidance systems pertaining to migration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srygley, R. B., Dudley, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal strategies for insects migrating in the flight boundary layer: mechanisms and consequences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn009v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gorilla Society: Conflict, Compromise and Cooperation Between the Sexes. Alexander H. Harcourt and Kelly J. Stewart, editors.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn009v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morton, F. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gorilla Society: Conflict, Compromise and Cooperation Between the Sexes. Alexander H. Harcourt and Kelly J. Stewart, editors.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New resources inform study of genome size, content, and organization in nonavian reptiles]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Genomic resources for studies of nonavian reptiles have recently improved and will reach a new level of access once the genomes of the painted turtle (<I>Chrysemys picta)</I> and the green anole (<I>Anolis carolinensis)</I> have been published. Eleven speakers gathered for a symposium on reptilian genomics and evolutionary genetics at the 2008 meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology in San Antonio, Texas. Presentations described results of reptilian genetic studies concerning molecular evolution, chromosomal evolution, genomic architecture, population dynamics, endocrinology and endocrine disruption, and the evolution of developmental mechanisms. The presented studies took advantage of the recent generation of genetic and genomic tools and resources. Novel findings demonstrated the positive impact made by the improved availability of resources like genome annotations and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs). The symposium was timely and important because it provided a vehicle for the dissemination of novel findings that advance the field. Moreover, this meeting fostered the synergistic interaction of the participants as a group, which is anticipated to encourage the funding and creation of further resources such as additional BAC libraries and genomic projects. Novel data have already been collected and studies like those presented in this symposium promise to shape and improve our understanding of overall amniote evolution. Additional reptilian taxa such as the American alligator (<I>Alligator mississippiensis</I>), tuatara (<I>Sphenodon punctatus</I>), and garter snake (<I>Thamnophis sirtalis</I>) should be the foci of future genomic projects. We hope that the following articles in this volume will help promote these efforts by describing the conclusions and the potential that the improvement of genomic resources for nonavian reptiles can continue having in this important area of integrative and comparative biology.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janes, D. E., Organ, C., Valenzuela, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New resources inform study of genome size, content, and organization in nonavian reptiles]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn008v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Origin of Higher Clades. Osteology, Myology, Phylogeny and Evolution of Bony Fishes and the Rise of Tetrapods. Rui Diogo.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn008v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Origin of Higher Clades. Osteology, Myology, Phylogeny and Evolution of Bony Fishes and the Rise of Tetrapods. Rui Diogo.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn007v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Encyclopedia of Tidepools and Rocky Shores. Mark W. Denny and Steven D. Gaines, editors.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn007v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolcott, T. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Encyclopedia of Tidepools and Rocky Shores. Mark W. Denny and Steven D. Gaines, editors.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm107v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. Victor Rico-Gray and Paulo S. Oliveira.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm107v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbott, K. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. Victor Rico-Gray and Paulo S. Oliveira.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn005v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantifying Behavior the JWatcher Way. Daniel T. Blumstein and Janice C. Daniel.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn005v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stankowich, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantifying Behavior the JWatcher Way. Daniel T. Blumstein and Janice C. Daniel.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn006v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rodent Societies - An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. Jerry O. Wolff and Paul W. Sherman, editors.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn006v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patisaul, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rodent Societies - An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. Jerry O. Wolff and Paul W. Sherman, editors.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Introduction to Nervous Systems. Ralph J. Greenspan, editor.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grossfeld, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Introduction to Nervous Systems. Ralph J. Greenspan, editor.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn003v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Marine Parasitology. Klaus Rohde, editor.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn003v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desdevises, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Marine Parasitology. Klaus Rohde, editor.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn001v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of a refuge from persistent male courtship in the Drosophila laboratory environment]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn001v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The <I>Drosophila melanogaster</I> laboratory model has been used extensively in studies of sexual conflict because during the process of courtship and mating, males impose several costs upon females (e.g., reduced fecundity). One important difference between the laboratory and the wild is that females in the laboratory lack a spatial refuge from persistent male courtship. Here, we describe two experiments that examine the potential consequences of a spatial refuge for females. In the first experiment, we examined the influence of a spatial refuge on mating rate of females, and in the second one we examined its influence on females&rsquo; lifetime fecundity. We found that females mated about 25% less often when a spatial refuge was available, but that the absence of a spatial refuge did not substantially increase the level of male-induced harm to females (i.e., sexual conflict).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byrne, P. G., Rice, G. R., Rice, W. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of a refuge from persistent male courtship in the Drosophila laboratory environment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn002v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icn002v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icn002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Erratum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm106v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Third Edition. Elliott Sober, editor.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm106v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Padilla, D. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Third Edition. Elliott Sober, editor.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm101v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Light and Smith Manual--Intertidal Invertebrates from Central California to Oregon (Fourth Edition). James T. Carlton, editor.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm101v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolcott, T., Wolcott, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Light and Smith Manual--Intertidal Invertebrates from Central California to Oregon (Fourth Edition). James T. Carlton, editor.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm102v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[More Than Kin and Less Than Kind. The Evolution of Family Conflict Douglas W. Mock.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm102v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm102</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[More Than Kin and Less Than Kind. The Evolution of Family Conflict Douglas W. Mock.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm103v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Flow Phenomena in Nature, Volumes 1 and 2. R. Liebe, editor.]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm103v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauder, G. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Flow Phenomena in Nature, Volumes 1 and 2. R. Liebe, editor.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm100v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Wily Monkeys: Social Intelligence of Tibetan Macaques. Hideshi Ogawa (translated by Akie Yanagi).]]></title>
<link>http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/icm100v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majolo, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/icb/icm100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Wily Monkeys: Social Intelligence of Tibetan Macaques. Hideshi Ogawa (translated by Akie Yanagi).]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>